NADQ.DE vs. LSMC.DE
NADQ.DE (Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist) and LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NADQ.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®, while LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NADQ.DE returned 21.45%/yr vs 28.49%/yr for LSMC.DE. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NADQ.DE charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LSMC.DE.
Performance
NADQ.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NADQ.DE achieves a 20.63% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 63.83% return. Over the past 10 years, NADQ.DE has underperformed LSMC.DE with an annualized return of 21.45%, while LSMC.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 28.49% annualized return.
NADQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 20.63%
- 6M
- 18.75%
- 1Y
- 37.21%
- 3Y*
- 24.74%
- 5Y*
- 18.92%
- 10Y*
- 21.45%
LSMC.DE
- 1D
- -3.34%
- 1M
- 12.86%
- YTD
- 63.83%
- 6M
- 63.41%
- 1Y
- 126.99%
- 3Y*
- 62.06%
- 5Y*
- 36.20%
- 10Y*
- 28.49%
NADQ.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NADQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist | 20.63% | 7.04% | 34.07% | 51.46% | -29.91% | 39.75% | 34.72% | 43.03% | 3.29% | 15.73% |
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 63.83% | 32.60% | 66.54% | 74.46% | -34.66% | 37.56% | 23.03% | 39.73% | -5.73% | 12.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between NADQ.DE and LSMC.DE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2008 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, NADQ.DE and LSMC.DE have become more correlated (0.85) than their long-term average of 0.64, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NADQ.DE vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
NADQ.DE
LSMC.DE
NADQ.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NADQ.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.59 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 10.37 | -6.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.32 | 32.83 | -21.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NADQ.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 4.27 | -1.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 1.15 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.11 | 1.09 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.82 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
NADQ.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NADQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.44%, smaller than the maximum LSMC.DE drawdown of -39.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NADQ.DE and LSMC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NADQ.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.44% | -39.77% | +6.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.97% | -12.53% | +2.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.70% | -36.22% | +9.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.16% | -39.77% | +8.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.16% | -39.77% | +8.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -3.34% | +2.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.93% | -9.37% | +3.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 3.96% | -0.61% |
Volatility
NADQ.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) is 4.26%, while Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a volatility of 11.23%. This indicates that NADQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NADQ.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | 11.23% | -6.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.95% | 22.18% | -11.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.74% | 30.40% | -14.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 31.21% | -11.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.54% | 26.06% | -6.52% |
NADQ.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
NADQ.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
NADQ.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison
NADQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, while LSMC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NADQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.55% | 0.40% | 0.79% | 0.51% | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NADQ.DE and LSMC.DE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NADQ.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NADQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
NADQ.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while LSMC.DE is Semiconductors. NADQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for NADQ.DE and 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
Find the right allocation for NADQ.DE and LSMC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer