NADQ.DE vs. FTGQ.DE
NADQ.DE (Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist) and FTGQ.DE (First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. NADQ.DE is passively managed, while FTGQ.DE is actively managed. Over the past year, NADQ.DE returned 38.00% vs 16.15% for FTGQ.DE. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NADQ.DE charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for FTGQ.DE.
Performance
NADQ.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NADQ.DE achieves a 20.63% return, which is significantly higher than FTGQ.DE's 7.60% return.
NADQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 9.24%
- YTD
- 20.63%
- 6M
- 19.44%
- 1Y
- 38.00%
- 3Y*
- 24.74%
- 5Y*
- 18.92%
- 10Y*
- 21.45%
FTGQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- 7.60%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 16.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NADQ.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NADQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist | 20.63% | 7.04% | -0.90% |
FTGQ.DE First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation | 7.60% | 1.05% | -3.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between NADQ.DE and FTGQ.DE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2024 | 0.76 |
The correlation between NADQ.DE and FTGQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NADQ.DE vs. FTGQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
NADQ.DE
FTGQ.DE
NADQ.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) and First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation (FTGQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NADQ.DE | FTGQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.34 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 4.23 | -0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.32 | 11.47 | -0.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NADQ.DE | FTGQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 1.86 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.25 | +0.72 |
Drawdowns
NADQ.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NADQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.44%, which is greater than FTGQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NADQ.DE and FTGQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NADQ.DE | FTGQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.44% | -19.13% | -14.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.97% | -3.80% | -6.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -0.17% | -0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.93% | -5.88% | -0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 1.41% | +1.94% |
Volatility
NADQ.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation (FTGQ.DE) at 1.30%. This indicates that NADQ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTGQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NADQ.DE | FTGQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | 1.30% | +2.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.95% | 5.09% | +5.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.74% | 8.64% | +7.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 12.69% | +7.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.54% | 12.69% | +6.85% |
NADQ.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
NADQ.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than FTGQ.DE's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
NADQ.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
NADQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, while FTGQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTGQ.DE First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NADQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.55% | 0.40% | 0.79% | 0.51% | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NADQ.DE and FTGQ.DE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NADQ.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NADQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for FTGQ.DE.
They also come from different issuers: Amundi and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for NADQ.DE and 0.90% for FTGQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for NADQ.DE and FTGQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer