NA vs. CM
Compare and contrast key facts about Nano Labs Ltd (NA) (NA) and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM).
Performance
NA vs. CM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NA vs. CM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NA Nano Labs Ltd (NA) | -6.03% | -64.81% | -50.55% | 57.40% | -90.46% |
CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 5.43% | 49.02% | 37.83% | 27.23% | -12.71% |
Fundamentals
NA:
$48.98M
CM:
$64.77B
NA:
-$3.81
CM:
$10.70
NA:
2.03
CM:
1.34
NA:
0.08
CM:
1.12
NA:
$24.14M
CM:
$61.67B
NA:
$11.78M
CM:
$27.76B
NA:
-$55.00M
CM:
$12.73B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NA achieves a -6.03% return, which is significantly lower than CM's 5.43% return.
NA
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- -6.03%
- 6M
- -45.19%
- 1Y
- -34.22%
- 3Y*
- -34.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CM
- 1D
- 3.21%
- 1M
- -5.38%
- YTD
- 5.43%
- 6M
- 20.59%
- 1Y
- 74.37%
- 3Y*
- 37.30%
- 5Y*
- 20.04%
- 10Y*
- 15.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NA vs. CM — Risk / Return Rank
NA
CM
NA vs. CM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nano Labs Ltd (NA) (NA) and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NA | CM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | 4.09 | -4.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.57 | 5.12 | -4.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.70 | -0.63 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 6.93 | -7.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.64 | 30.75 | -31.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NA | CM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 | 4.09 | -4.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.38 | 0.49 | -0.86 |
Correlation
The correlation between NA and CM is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
NA vs. CM - Dividend Comparison
NA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NA Nano Labs Ltd (NA) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 3.13% | 3.17% | 4.21% | 5.88% | 7.77% | 4.08% | 5.06% | 6.47% | 5.48% | 5.28% | 5.93% | 6.71% |
Drawdowns
NA vs. CM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NA drawdown since its inception was -97.66%, which is greater than CM's maximum drawdown of -71.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NA and CM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NA | CM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.66% | -71.70% | -25.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -80.13% | -10.79% | -69.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.54% | -7.92% | -89.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.80% | -14.74% | -75.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 61.10% | 2.43% | +58.67% |
Volatility
NA vs. CM - Volatility Comparison
Nano Labs Ltd (NA) (NA) has a higher volatility of 13.40% compared to Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 7.43%. This indicates that NA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NA | CM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.40% | 7.43% | +5.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.58% | 14.33% | +39.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 139.05% | 18.30% | +120.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 168.31% | 21.07% | +147.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 168.31% | 22.51% | +145.80% |
Financials
NA vs. CM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nano Labs Ltd (NA) and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities