NA vs. CM
NA (Nano Labs Ltd (NA)) and CM (Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce) are both stocks. NA operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while CM operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 3 years, NA returned -52.49%/yr vs 42.81%/yr for CM. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NA vs. CM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NA achieves a -26.83% return, which is significantly lower than CM's 19.52% return.
NA
- 1D
- -7.80%
- 1M
- 12.71%
- YTD
- -26.83%
- 6M
- -44.05%
- 1Y
- -39.18%
- 3Y*
- -52.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CM
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- -2.30%
- YTD
- 19.52%
- 6M
- 25.77%
- 1Y
- 64.41%
- 3Y*
- 42.81%
- 5Y*
- 18.33%
- 10Y*
- 16.77%
NA vs. CM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NA Nano Labs Ltd (NA) | -26.83% | -64.81% | -50.55% | 57.40% | -90.46% |
CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 19.52% | 49.02% | 37.83% | 27.23% | -12.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between NA and CM is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2022 | 0.17 |
Fundamentals
NA:
-$3.81
CM:
$12.14
NA:
1.58
CM:
1.41
NA:
$24.14M
CM:
$61.84B
NA:
$11.78M
CM:
$28.74B
NA:
-$55.00M
CM:
$13.01B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NA vs. CM — Risk / Return Rank
NA
CM
NA vs. CM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nano Labs Ltd (NA) (NA) and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NA | CM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.58 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | 6.00 | -6.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.56 | 24.66 | -25.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NA | CM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 | 3.44 | -3.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.38 | 0.50 | -0.88 |
Drawdowns
NA vs. CM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NA drawdown since its inception was -98.67%, which is greater than CM's maximum drawdown of -71.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NA and CM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NA | CM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.67% | -71.70% | -26.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -89.19% | -10.79% | -78.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -94.10% | -19.47% | -74.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.09% | -7.23% | -90.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.17% | -14.67% | -75.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 70.02% | 2.62% | +67.40% |
Volatility
NA vs. CM - Volatility Comparison
Nano Labs Ltd (NA) (NA) has a higher volatility of 42.62% compared to Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) at 7.84%. This indicates that NA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NA | CM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 42.62% | 7.84% | +34.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 71.07% | 16.39% | +54.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 146.47% | 18.84% | +127.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 166.82% | 21.39% | +145.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 166.82% | 22.61% | +144.21% |
Dividends
NA vs. CM - Dividend Comparison
NA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CM Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce | 2.76% | 3.17% | 4.21% | 5.88% | 7.77% | 4.08% | 5.06% | 6.47% | 5.48% | 5.28% | 5.93% | 6.71% |
NA Nano Labs Ltd (NA) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
NA vs. CM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nano Labs Ltd (NA) and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NA and CM have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NA has higher volatility (42.62%) compared to CM (7.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NA dropped -98.67% vs CM's -71.70%.
CM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.44 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NA and CM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer