NA vs. RY

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Nano Labs Ltd (NA) (NA) and Royal Bank of Canada (RY).

Performance

NA vs. RY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nano Labs Ltd (NA) (NA) and Royal Bank of Canada (RY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NA vs. RY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
NA Nano Labs Ltd (NA)	-6.03%	-64.81%	-50.55%	57.40%	-90.46%
RY Royal Bank of Canada	-4.43%	46.29%	23.80%	12.72%	-2.06%

Fundamentals

Market Cap NA : $48.98M RY : $166.45B
EPS NA : -$3.81 RY : $15.98
PS Ratio NA : 2.03 RY : 1.55
PB Ratio NA : 0.08 RY : 1.29
Total Revenue (TTM) NA : $24.14M RY : $137.63B
Gross Profit (TTM) NA : $11.78M RY : $63.36B
EBITDA (TTM) NA : -$55.00M RY : $29.23B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NA achieves a -6.03% return, which is significantly lower than RY's -4.43% return.

NA

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: -6.03%
• 6M: -45.19%
• 1Y: -34.22%
• 3Y*: -34.22%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RY

• 1D: 2.49%
• 1M: -3.26%
• YTD: -4.43%
• 6M: 11.43%
• 1Y: 48.21%
• 3Y*: 23.86%
• 5Y*: 16.15%
• 10Y*: 15.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NA vs. RY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NA

NA Risk / Return Rank: 34
NA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
NA Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
NA Omega Ratio Rank: 43
NA Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
NA Martin Ratio Rank: 31

RY

RY Risk / Return Rank: 96
RY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
RY Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
RY Omega Ratio Rank: 96
RY Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
RY Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NA vs. RY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nano Labs Ltd (NA) (NA) and Royal Bank of Canada (RY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NA	RY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.25	2.91	-3.16
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.57	4.05	-3.48
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.53	-0.46
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.49	4.88	-5.37
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.64	18.67	-19.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NA vs. RY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NA Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the RY Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NA and RY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NA	RY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.25	2.91	-3.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.91	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.77	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.38	0.62	-1.00

Correlation

The correlation between NA and RY is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NA vs. RY - Dividend Comparison

NA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NA Nano Labs Ltd (NA)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RY Royal Bank of Canada	2.78%	2.54%	3.39%	4.29%	4.07%	3.24%	3.88%	3.88%	4.27%	3.22%	3.95%	5.41%

Drawdowns

NA vs. RY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NA drawdown since its inception was -97.66%, which is greater than RY's maximum drawdown of -62.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NA and RY.

Drawdown Indicators

	NA	RY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.66%	-62.90%	-34.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-80.13%	-10.04%	-70.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.36%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.95%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-97.54%	-7.80%	-89.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-89.80%	-9.37%	-80.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	61.10%	2.62%	+58.48%

Volatility

NA vs. RY - Volatility Comparison

Nano Labs Ltd (NA) (NA) has a higher volatility of 13.40% compared to Royal Bank of Canada (RY) at 5.19%. This indicates that NA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NA	RY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.40%	5.19%	+8.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.58%	10.79%	+42.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	139.05%	16.65%	+122.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	168.31%	17.85%	+150.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	168.31%	19.81%	+148.50%

Financials