PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NA vs. JPM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NA vs. JPM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nano Labs Ltd (NA) (NA) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NA achieves a -26.83% return, which is significantly lower than JPM's -5.73% return.


NA

1D
-7.80%
1M
12.71%
YTD
-26.83%
6M
-44.05%
1Y
-39.18%
3Y*
-52.49%
5Y*
10Y*

JPM

1D
-0.04%
1M
-2.21%
YTD
-5.73%
6M
-2.68%
1Y
15.18%
3Y*
31.87%
5Y*
15.45%
10Y*
19.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NA vs. JPM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NA
Nano Labs Ltd (NA)
-26.83%-64.81%-50.55%57.40%-90.46%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
-5.73%37.27%44.29%30.63%19.77%

Correlation

The correlation between NA and JPM is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2022

0.08

Fundamentals

EPS

NA:

-$3.81

JPM:

$21.08

PS Ratio

NA:

1.58

JPM:

2.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

NA:

$24.14M

JPM:

$285.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NA:

$11.78M

JPM:

$173.52B

EBITDA (TTM)

NA:

-$55.00M

JPM:

$81.46B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NA vs. JPM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NA
NA Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
NA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
NA Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
NA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
NA Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

JPM
JPM Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
JPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPM Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
JPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPM Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NA vs. JPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nano Labs Ltd (NA) (NA) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NAJPMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.14

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.44

0.99

-1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.56

2.36

-2.92

NA vs. JPM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NA Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the JPM Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NA and JPM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NAJPMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

0.71

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.38

0.34

-0.72

Drawdowns

NA vs. JPM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NA drawdown since its inception was -98.67%, which is greater than JPM's maximum drawdown of -76.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NA and JPM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NAJPMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.67%

-76.16%

-22.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-89.19%

-15.47%

-73.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-94.10%

-24.42%

-69.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.09%

-9.63%

-88.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-90.17%

-17.62%

-72.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

70.02%

6.46%

+63.56%

Volatility

NA vs. JPM - Volatility Comparison

Nano Labs Ltd (NA) (NA) has a higher volatility of 42.62% compared to JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) at 6.39%. This indicates that NA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NAJPMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

42.62%

6.39%

+36.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

71.07%

17.16%

+53.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

146.47%

21.41%

+125.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

166.82%

24.41%

+142.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

166.82%

27.37%

+139.45%

Dividends

NA vs. JPM - Dividend Comparison

NA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.96%1.72%1.92%2.38%2.98%2.34%2.83%2.37%2.54%1.91%2.13%2.54%
NA
Nano Labs Ltd (NA)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NA vs. JPM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nano Labs Ltd (NA) and JPMorgan Chase & Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
4.14M
73.66B
(NA) Total Revenue
(JPM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NA and JPM have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NA has higher volatility (42.62%) compared to JPM (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NA dropped -98.67% vs JPM's -76.16%.

JPM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NA and JPM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer