PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NA.TO vs. NLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NA.TO vs. NLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in National Bank of Canada (NA.TO) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NA.TO is traded in CAD, while NLR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NLR values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NA.TO achieves a 22.40% return, which is significantly higher than NLR's 0.28% return. Over the past 10 years, NA.TO has outperformed NLR with an annualized return of 21.48%, while NLR has yielded a comparatively lower 13.78% annualized return.


NA.TO

1D
0.62%
1M
2.52%
YTD
22.40%
6M
23.26%
1Y
60.21%
3Y*
33.78%
5Y*
22.51%
10Y*
21.48%

NLR

1D
1.13%
1M
-8.70%
YTD
0.28%
6M
-2.22%
1Y
21.51%
3Y*
31.87%
5Y*
23.32%
10Y*
13.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NA.TO vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NA.TO
National Bank of Canada
22.40%36.15%34.65%15.53%-1.45%39.02%4.01%34.04%-6.92%19.77%
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
0.28%49.35%23.94%33.42%8.77%13.57%1.03%-3.93%13.76%0.92%

Correlation

The correlation between NA.TO and NLR is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2007

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NA.TO vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NA.TO
NA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
NA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
NA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
NA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
NA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

NLR
NLR Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NA.TO vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for National Bank of Canada (NA.TO) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NA.TONLRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

1.11

+0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.73

0.78

+5.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.50

1.64

+20.86

NA.TO vs. NLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.77, which is higher than the NLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NA.TO and NLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NA.TO vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NA.TO drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -58.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NA.TO and NLR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NA.TONLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.45%

-58.49%

+3.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.99%

-27.87%

+18.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.58%

-31.23%

+8.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.58%

-31.23%

+8.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.22%

-31.23%

-16.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-23.68%

+22.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.76%

-23.24%

+16.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

13.18%

-10.50%

Volatility

NA.TO vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for National Bank of Canada (NA.TO) is 6.17%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 13.89%. This indicates that NA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NA.TONLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.17%

13.89%

-7.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.64%

33.92%

-20.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.05%

42.93%

-26.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.50%

30.21%

-12.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.94%

25.02%

-4.08%

Dividends

NA.TO vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison

NA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than NLR's 2.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NA.TO
National Bank of Canada
2.31%2.75%3.36%4.03%4.03%3.11%3.96%3.77%4.44%3.70%4.03%5.16%
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
2.60%2.55%0.76%4.54%2.02%1.99%2.23%2.21%3.91%4.86%3.62%3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


NA.TO and NLR have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NA.TO and NLR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer