NA.TO vs. NLR
NA.TO (National Bank of Canada) is a stock, while NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) is Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Over the past 10 years, NA.TO returned 21.48%/yr vs 13.78%/yr for NLR. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NA.TO vs. NLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NA.TO is traded in CAD, while NLR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NLR values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NA.TO achieves a 22.40% return, which is significantly higher than NLR's 0.28% return. Over the past 10 years, NA.TO has outperformed NLR with an annualized return of 21.48%, while NLR has yielded a comparatively lower 13.78% annualized return.
NA.TO
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- YTD
- 22.40%
- 6M
- 23.26%
- 1Y
- 60.21%
- 3Y*
- 33.78%
- 5Y*
- 22.51%
- 10Y*
- 21.48%
NLR
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -8.70%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- -2.22%
- 1Y
- 21.51%
- 3Y*
- 31.87%
- 5Y*
- 23.32%
- 10Y*
- 13.78%
NA.TO vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NA.TO National Bank of Canada | 22.40% | 36.15% | 34.65% | 15.53% | -1.45% | 39.02% | 4.01% | 34.04% | -6.92% | 19.77% |
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | 0.28% | 49.35% | 23.94% | 33.42% | 8.77% | 13.57% | 1.03% | -3.93% | 13.76% | 0.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between NA.TO and NLR is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2007 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NA.TO vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank
NA.TO
NLR
NA.TO vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for National Bank of Canada (NA.TO) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NA.TO | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.70 | 1.11 | +0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.73 | 0.78 | +5.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.50 | 1.64 | +20.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NA.TO vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NA.TO drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -58.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NA.TO and NLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NA.TO | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.45% | -58.49% | +3.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.99% | -27.87% | +18.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.58% | -31.23% | +8.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.58% | -31.23% | +8.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.22% | -31.23% | -16.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.68% | -23.68% | +22.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.76% | -23.24% | +16.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 13.18% | -10.50% |
Volatility
NA.TO vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for National Bank of Canada (NA.TO) is 6.17%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 13.89%. This indicates that NA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NA.TO | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.17% | 13.89% | -7.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.64% | 33.92% | -20.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.05% | 42.93% | -26.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 30.21% | -12.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.94% | 25.02% | -4.08% |
Dividends
NA.TO vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison
NA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than NLR's 2.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NA.TO National Bank of Canada | 2.31% | 2.75% | 3.36% | 4.03% | 4.03% | 3.11% | 3.96% | 3.77% | 4.44% | 3.70% | 4.03% | 5.16% |
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | 2.60% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NA.TO and NLR have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for NA.TO and NLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer