PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MZZ vs. NVDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MZZ vs. NVDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 (MZZ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MZZ vs. NVDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MZZ
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400
-4.67%-14.68%10.11%
NVDG
Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF
-17.87%32.45%-0.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MZZ achieves a -4.67% return, which is significantly higher than NVDG's -17.87% return.


MZZ

1D
-5.79%
1M
10.93%
YTD
-4.67%
6M
-6.84%
1Y
-28.70%
3Y*
-17.85%
5Y*
-14.42%
10Y*
-24.28%

NVDG

1D
11.02%
1M
-5.35%
YTD
-17.87%
6M
-22.83%
1Y
93.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MZZ vs. NVDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MZZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MZZ vs. NVDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MZZ
MZZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
MZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
MZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
MZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
MZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDG
NVDG Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
NVDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDG Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MZZ vs. NVDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 (MZZ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MZZNVDGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.68

1.15

-1.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.80

1.91

-2.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.24

-0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.57

2.11

-2.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.76

5.07

-5.83

MZZ vs. NVDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MZZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the NVDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MZZ and NVDG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MZZNVDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.68

1.15

-1.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.59

0.07

-0.65

Correlation

The correlation between MZZ and NVDG is -0.41. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

MZZ vs. NVDG - Dividend Comparison

MZZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, less than NVDG's 14.38% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
MZZ
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400
5.44%5.27%6.36%4.52%0.25%0.00%0.22%1.53%0.53%
NVDG
Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF
14.38%11.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MZZ vs. NVDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MZZ drawdown since its inception was -99.89%, which is greater than NVDG's maximum drawdown of -66.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MZZ and NVDG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MZZNVDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.89%

-66.19%

-33.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.56%

-42.72%

-7.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.87%

-36.40%

-63.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-85.95%

-24.00%

-61.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.39%

17.77%

+20.62%

Volatility

MZZ vs. NVDG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 (MZZ) is 13.03%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG) has a volatility of 20.82%. This indicates that MZZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MZZNVDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.03%

20.82%

-7.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.92%

51.08%

-27.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.21%

81.33%

-39.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.16%

92.52%

-53.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.35%

92.52%

-51.17%