MZZ vs. BRKW
MZZ (ProShares UltraShort MidCap400) and BRKW (Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MZZ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index (-200%), while BRKW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. MZZ is passively managed, while BRKW is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. MZZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BRKW.
Performance
MZZ vs. BRKW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MZZ achieves a -22.57% return, which is significantly lower than BRKW's -8.59% return.
MZZ
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- -5.89%
- YTD
- -22.57%
- 6M
- -23.66%
- 1Y
- -35.66%
- 3Y*
- -23.59%
- 5Y*
- -16.74%
- 10Y*
- -25.27%
BRKW
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- YTD
- -8.59%
- 6M
- -9.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MZZ vs. BRKW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MZZ ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 | -22.57% | -15.28% |
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF | -8.59% | 2.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between MZZ and BRKW is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | -0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MZZ vs. BRKW — Risk / Return Rank
MZZ
BRKW
MZZ vs. BRKW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 (MZZ) and Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF (BRKW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MZZ | BRKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.15 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.65 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.73 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MZZ | BRKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.60 | -0.41 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
MZZ vs. BRKW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MZZ drawdown since its inception was -99.90%, which is greater than BRKW's maximum drawdown of -12.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MZZ and BRKW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MZZ | BRKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.90% | -12.64% | -87.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.90% | -11.51% | -88.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.07% | -5.32% | -80.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.39% | — | — |
Volatility
MZZ vs. BRKW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MZZ | BRKW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.88% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.99% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.15% | 17.24% | +13.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.16% | 17.24% | +21.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.39% | 17.24% | +24.15% |
MZZ vs. BRKW - Expense Ratio Comparison
MZZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BRKW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
MZZ vs. BRKW - Dividend Comparison
MZZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, less than BRKW's 25.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRKW Roundhill BRKB WeeklyPay ETF | 25.42% | 14.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MZZ ProShares UltraShort MidCap400 | 6.70% | 5.27% | 6.36% | 4.52% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 1.53% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MZZ and BRKW have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MZZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MZZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BRKW.
BRKW has the higher dividend yield at 25.42%, compared with 6.70% for MZZ.
MZZ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BRKW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MZZ and 0.99% for BRKW.
Find the right allocation for MZZ and BRKW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer