PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MZLSX vs. BRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MZLSX vs. BRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Muzinich Low Duration Fund (MZLSX) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MZLSX achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly higher than BRW's 1.14% return.


MZLSX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.62%
YTD
1.54%
6M
1.71%
1Y
4.79%
3Y*
6.44%
5Y*
3.73%
10Y*

BRW

1D
1.39%
1M
-1.43%
YTD
1.14%
6M
2.01%
1Y
-3.62%
3Y*
9.44%
5Y*
6.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MZLSX vs. BRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MZLSX
Muzinich Low Duration Fund
1.54%6.38%6.30%7.63%-3.41%1.14%
BRW
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund
1.14%5.89%12.16%18.49%-4.64%3.19%

Correlation

The correlation between MZLSX and BRW is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2021

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MZLSX vs. BRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MZLSX
MZLSX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MZLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MZLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MZLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MZLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
MZLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

BRW
BRW Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRW Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRW Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MZLSX vs. BRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Muzinich Low Duration Fund (MZLSX) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MZLSXBRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.81

0.96

+0.85

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

-0.21

+3.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.79

-0.36

+15.15

MZLSX vs. BRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MZLSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is higher than the BRW Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MZLSX and BRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MZLSX vs. BRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MZLSX drawdown since its inception was -12.66%, smaller than the maximum BRW drawdown of -17.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MZLSX and BRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MZLSXBRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.66%

-17.74%

+5.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.50%

-17.74%

+16.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.50%

-17.74%

+16.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.09%

-17.74%

+11.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-10.88%

+10.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.85%

-4.00%

+3.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.33%

10.19%

-9.86%

Volatility

MZLSX vs. BRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Muzinich Low Duration Fund (MZLSX) is 0.44%, while Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that MZLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MZLSXBRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.44%

4.44%

-4.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.36%

8.23%

-6.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56%

13.40%

-11.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.63%

12.94%

-11.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.13%

12.90%

-10.77%

MZLSX vs. BRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

MZLSX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BRW's 1.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

MZLSX vs. BRW - Dividend Comparison

MZLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.22%, less than BRW's 15.49% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BRW
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund
15.49%14.46%12.27%16.02%13.82%4.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MZLSX
Muzinich Low Duration Fund
7.22%7.03%4.77%4.88%3.85%6.36%2.08%2.24%8.62%1.86%0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


MZLSX and BRW have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRW has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to MZLSX (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MZLSX dropped -12.66% vs BRW's -17.74%.

MZLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MZLSX and BRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer