PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MZLSX vs. WSINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MZLSX vs. WSINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Muzinich Low Duration Fund (MZLSX) and Allspring Income Plus Fund (WSINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MZLSX achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly higher than WSINX's 0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, MZLSX has underperformed WSINX with an annualized return of 3.69%, while WSINX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.90% annualized return.


MZLSX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.11%
6M
1.21%
YTD
1.63%
1Y
3.96%
3Y*
6.11%
5Y*
3.69%
10Y*
3.69%
ALL TIME*
3.69%

WSINX

1D
0.23%
1M
-1.13%
6M
-0.38%
YTD
0.26%
1Y
2.88%
3Y*
5.84%
5Y*
2.31%
10Y*
3.90%
ALL TIME*
3.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MZLSX vs. WSINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MZLSX
Muzinich Low Duration Fund
1.63%6.38%6.30%7.63%-3.41%2.50%2.64%7.86%0.80%4.26%
WSINX
Allspring Income Plus Fund
0.26%6.61%5.43%9.40%-9.25%3.08%8.14%8.65%-0.66%6.84%

Correlation

The correlation between MZLSX and WSINX is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2016

0.56

The correlation between MZLSX and WSINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MZLSX vs. WSINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MZLSX
MZLSX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MZLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MZLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MZLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
MZLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
MZLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

WSINX
WSINX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
WSINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WSINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
WSINX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
WSINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
WSINX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MZLSX vs. WSINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Muzinich Low Duration Fund (MZLSX) and Allspring Income Plus Fund (WSINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MZLSXWSINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.23

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

1.22

+1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.05

4.58

+7.47

MZLSX vs. WSINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MZLSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the WSINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MZLSX and WSINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MZLSX vs. WSINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MZLSX drawdown since its inception was -12.66%, roughly equal to the maximum WSINX drawdown of -13.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MZLSX and WSINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MZLSXWSINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.66%

-13.31%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.50%

-2.75%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.50%

-3.24%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.09%

-13.04%

+6.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.66%

-13.31%

+0.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-1.24%

+1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.84%

-1.98%

+1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

0.73%

-0.39%

Volatility

MZLSX vs. WSINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Muzinich Low Duration Fund (MZLSX) is 0.36%, while Allspring Income Plus Fund (WSINX) has a volatility of 0.85%. This indicates that MZLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WSINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MZLSXWSINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

0.85%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.37%

2.30%

-0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58%

2.71%

-1.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.63%

3.81%

-2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.12%

3.54%

-1.42%

MZLSX vs. WSINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MZLSX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than WSINX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

MZLSX vs. WSINX - Dividend Comparison

MZLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.14%, more than WSINX's 4.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MZLSX
Muzinich Low Duration Fund
7.14%7.03%4.77%4.88%3.85%6.36%2.08%2.24%8.62%1.86%0.79%0.00%
WSINX
Allspring Income Plus Fund
4.51%4.91%5.43%5.59%3.76%6.55%3.12%3.56%3.83%2.88%2.87%1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


MZLSX and WSINX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WSINX has higher volatility (0.85%) compared to MZLSX (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MZLSX dropped -12.66% vs WSINX's -13.31%.

MZLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MZLSX and WSINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer