MYCF vs. LQDH
MYCF (State Street My2026 Corporate Bond ETF) and LQDH (iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MYCF returned 4.60% vs 7.62% for LQDH. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MYCF charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for LQDH.
Performance
MYCF vs. LQDH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MYCF achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly lower than LQDH's 2.31% return.
MYCF
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 4.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQDH
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 2.31%
- 6M
- 3.11%
- 1Y
- 7.62%
- 3Y*
- 8.08%
- 5Y*
- 5.28%
- 10Y*
- 4.64%
MYCF vs. LQDH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MYCF State Street My2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.63% | 5.12% | 0.74% |
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 2.31% | 7.00% | 2.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between MYCF and LQDH is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MYCF vs. LQDH — Risk / Return Rank
MYCF
LQDH
MYCF vs. LQDH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2026 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCF) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MYCF | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +8.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.22 | 1.57 | +1.65 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 38.53 | 3.26 | +35.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 164.09 | 13.85 | +150.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MYCF | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.98 | 2.83 | +4.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.12 | 0.58 | +3.54 |
Drawdowns
MYCF vs. LQDH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MYCF drawdown since its inception was -0.60%, smaller than the maximum LQDH drawdown of -24.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYCF and LQDH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MYCF | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.60% | -24.63% | +24.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.12% | -2.34% | +2.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -7.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.09% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -1.68% | +1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.03% | 0.55% | -0.52% |
Volatility
MYCF vs. LQDH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street My2026 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCF) is 0.15%, while iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) has a volatility of 0.50%. This indicates that MYCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQDH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MYCF | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.15% | 0.50% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.43% | 2.03% | -1.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66% | 2.70% | -2.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.09% | 4.41% | -3.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.09% | 6.44% | -5.35% |
MYCF vs. LQDH - Expense Ratio Comparison
MYCF has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LQDH's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MYCF vs. LQDH - Dividend Comparison
MYCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, less than LQDH's 5.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 5.95% | 6.06% | 7.57% | 7.69% | 3.73% | 1.65% | 2.22% | 3.09% | 5.08% | 2.37% | 2.33% | 2.98% |
MYCF State Street My2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.40% | 4.50% | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MYCF and LQDH have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LQDH has higher volatility (0.50%) compared to MYCF (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYCF dropped -0.60% vs LQDH's -24.63%.
On 1-year performance, LQDH leads with 7.62% vs 4.60% for MYCF. On fees, MYCF is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MYCF has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LQDH has performed better with a 7.62% return vs 4.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MYCF is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LQDH.
LQDH has the higher dividend yield at 5.95%, compared with 4.40% for MYCF.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MYCF and 0.25% for LQDH.
MYCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.98 vs 2.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MYCF and LQDH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer