PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXXLX vs. MXLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXXLX vs. MXLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Lifetime 2055 Fund (MXXLX) and Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund (MXLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXXLX achieves a 10.87% return, which is significantly higher than MXLGX's 6.05% return. Over the past 10 years, MXXLX has underperformed MXLGX with an annualized return of 9.64%, while MXLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.34% annualized return.


MXXLX

1D
0.32%
1M
4.42%
YTD
10.87%
6M
11.51%
1Y
23.84%
3Y*
16.39%
5Y*
7.78%
10Y*
9.64%

MXLGX

1D
0.18%
1M
5.24%
YTD
6.05%
6M
4.89%
1Y
18.86%
3Y*
20.23%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
16.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXXLX vs. MXLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXXLX
Great-West Lifetime 2055 Fund
10.87%17.54%10.65%17.25%-17.19%16.12%13.57%25.75%-13.05%21.19%
MXLGX
Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund
6.05%13.93%25.30%33.43%-34.08%41.30%40.72%36.20%-0.47%28.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MXXLX and MXLGX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2009

0.77

The correlation between MXXLX and MXLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXXLX vs. MXLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXXLX
MXXLX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
MXXLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXXLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXXLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
MXXLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXXLX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

MXLGX
MXLGX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
MXLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MXLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXXLX vs. MXLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2055 Fund (MXXLX) and Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund (MXLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXXLXMXLGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.03

1.43

+0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.85

2.00

+0.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.26

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

1.36

+1.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.39

4.21

+7.18

MXXLX vs. MXLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXXLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the MXLGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXXLX and MXLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXXLXMXLGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

1.43

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.57

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.70

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.26

+0.22

Drawdowns

MXXLX vs. MXLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXXLX drawdown since its inception was -33.59%, smaller than the maximum MXLGX drawdown of -62.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXXLX and MXLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXXLXMXLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.59%

-62.98%

+29.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-14.95%

+5.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.05%

-20.74%

+5.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.94%

-38.07%

+9.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.59%

-38.07%

+4.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.03%

-25.82%

+18.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

4.71%

-2.58%

Volatility

MXXLX vs. MXLGX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West Lifetime 2055 Fund (MXXLX) and Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund (MXLGX) have volatilities of 3.39% and 3.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXXLXMXLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

3.49%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.18%

10.55%

-1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.99%

14.15%

-2.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.60%

21.83%

-6.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.44%

23.46%

-7.02%

MXXLX vs. MXLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXXLX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than MXLGX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXXLX vs. MXLGX - Dividend Comparison

MXXLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than MXLGX's 12.16% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXLGX
Great-West Large Cap Growth Fund
12.16%12.90%9.72%2.95%9.29%21.33%30.57%17.96%25.47%5.25%
MXXLX
Great-West Lifetime 2055 Fund
2.68%2.97%4.27%3.42%7.87%8.92%5.05%9.47%10.16%2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXXLX and MXLGX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXLGX has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to MXXLX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXXLX dropped -33.59% vs MXLGX's -62.98%.

MXXLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXXLX and MXLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer