PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXXLX vs. MXBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXXLX vs. MXBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Lifetime 2055 Fund (MXXLX) and Great-West Bond Index Fund (MXBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXXLX achieves a 10.87% return, which is significantly higher than MXBIX's 0.23% return. Over the past 10 years, MXXLX has outperformed MXBIX with an annualized return of 9.64%, while MXBIX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.95% annualized return.


MXXLX

1D
0.32%
1M
4.42%
YTD
10.87%
6M
11.51%
1Y
23.84%
3Y*
16.39%
5Y*
7.78%
10Y*
9.64%

MXBIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.38%
YTD
0.23%
6M
0.01%
1Y
4.86%
3Y*
3.51%
5Y*
-0.38%
10Y*
0.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXXLX vs. MXBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXXLX
Great-West Lifetime 2055 Fund
10.87%17.54%10.65%17.25%-17.19%16.12%13.57%25.75%-13.05%21.19%
MXBIX
Great-West Bond Index Fund
0.23%6.62%0.82%5.02%-13.69%-2.33%7.10%8.09%-0.26%2.56%

Correlation

The correlation between MXXLX and MXBIX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2009

-0.11

The correlation between MXXLX and MXBIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXXLX vs. MXBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXXLX
MXXLX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
MXXLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXXLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXXLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
MXXLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXXLX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

MXBIX
MXBIX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
MXBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
MXBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXXLX vs. MXBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2055 Fund (MXXLX) and Great-West Bond Index Fund (MXBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXXLXMXBIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.03

1.31

+0.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.85

1.95

+0.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.23

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

1.75

+0.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.39

5.20

+6.19

MXXLX vs. MXBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXXLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the MXBIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXXLX and MXBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXXLXMXBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

1.31

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

-0.06

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.20

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.09

+0.39

Drawdowns

MXXLX vs. MXBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXXLX drawdown since its inception was -33.59%, which is greater than MXBIX's maximum drawdown of -19.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXXLX and MXBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXXLXMXBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.59%

-19.74%

-13.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

-2.87%

-6.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.05%

-6.35%

-8.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.94%

-18.70%

-10.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.59%

-19.74%

-13.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.33%

+5.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.03%

-5.88%

-1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

0.94%

+1.19%

Volatility

MXXLX vs. MXBIX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West Lifetime 2055 Fund (MXXLX) has a higher volatility of 3.39% compared to Great-West Bond Index Fund (MXBIX) at 1.28%. This indicates that MXXLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXXLXMXBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

1.28%

+2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.18%

2.65%

+6.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.99%

3.82%

+8.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.60%

6.04%

+9.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.44%

4.93%

+11.51%

MXXLX vs. MXBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXXLX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than MXBIX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXXLX vs. MXBIX - Dividend Comparison

MXXLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than MXBIX's 2.77% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXBIX
Great-West Bond Index Fund
2.77%2.78%2.42%1.98%1.32%1.51%2.83%1.06%1.33%0.70%
MXXLX
Great-West Lifetime 2055 Fund
2.68%2.97%4.27%3.42%7.87%8.92%5.05%9.47%10.16%2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXXLX and MXBIX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXXLX has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to MXBIX (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXXLX dropped -33.59% vs MXBIX's -19.74%.

MXXLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXXLX and MXBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer