PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXXIX vs. MGLBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXXIX vs. MGLBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Marsico Midcap Growth Focus Fund (MXXIX) and Marsico Global Fund (MGLBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXXIX achieves a 14.23% return, which is significantly lower than MGLBX's 15.82% return. Over the past 10 years, MXXIX has underperformed MGLBX with an annualized return of 16.90%, while MGLBX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.64% annualized return.


MXXIX

1D
-0.51%
1M
2.72%
YTD
14.23%
6M
14.38%
1Y
27.73%
3Y*
32.30%
5Y*
13.08%
10Y*
16.90%

MGLBX

1D
-1.15%
1M
6.58%
YTD
15.82%
6M
17.39%
1Y
27.48%
3Y*
32.02%
5Y*
13.82%
10Y*
19.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXXIX vs. MGLBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXXIX
Marsico Midcap Growth Focus Fund
14.23%26.09%42.95%21.71%-31.84%12.04%45.34%29.88%1.76%30.05%
MGLBX
Marsico Global Fund
15.82%27.15%40.57%35.38%-34.54%10.96%81.92%27.18%-4.50%40.25%

Correlation

The correlation between MXXIX and MGLBX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2007

0.90

The correlation between MXXIX and MGLBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXXIX vs. MGLBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXXIX
MXXIX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
MXXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MXXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

MGLBX
MGLBX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
MGLBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGLBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGLBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
MGLBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGLBX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXXIX vs. MGLBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marsico Midcap Growth Focus Fund (MXXIX) and Marsico Global Fund (MGLBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXXIXMGLBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.27

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

1.94

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.31

8.06

+0.25

MXXIX vs. MGLBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXXIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the MGLBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXXIX and MGLBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXXIXMGLBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

1.48

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.63

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.85

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.57

-0.16

Drawdowns

MXXIX vs. MGLBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXXIX drawdown since its inception was -62.49%, roughly equal to the maximum MGLBX drawdown of -59.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXXIX and MGLBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXXIXMGLBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.49%

-59.60%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.07%

-14.92%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.05%

-20.66%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.59%

-43.08%

+2.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.59%

-43.08%

+2.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-1.15%

+0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.36%

-11.56%

-6.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

3.58%

-0.14%

Volatility

MXXIX vs. MGLBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Marsico Midcap Growth Focus Fund (MXXIX) is 6.30%, while Marsico Global Fund (MGLBX) has a volatility of 6.76%. This indicates that MXXIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGLBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXXIXMGLBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.30%

6.76%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.42%

16.14%

-0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.29%

19.56%

-0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.77%

21.97%

+0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.81%

23.06%

-1.25%

MXXIX vs. MGLBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXXIX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is lower than MGLBX's 1.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXXIX vs. MGLBX - Dividend Comparison

MXXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.46%, which matches MGLBX's 10.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGLBX
Marsico Global Fund
10.47%12.13%3.42%1.98%4.37%17.97%24.53%0.00%1.16%9.25%0.00%11.04%
MXXIX
Marsico Midcap Growth Focus Fund
10.46%11.95%9.18%1.24%0.00%14.22%2.83%3.26%5.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXXIX and MGLBX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGLBX has higher volatility (6.76%) compared to MXXIX (6.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXXIX dropped -62.49% vs MGLBX's -59.60%.

MXXIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXXIX and MGLBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer