MXSHX vs. SICIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Great-West SecureFoundation Balanced Fund (MXSHX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX).
MXSHX is managed by Great-West. It was launched on Nov 12, 2009. SICIX is managed by SEI. It was launched on Nov 16, 2003.
Performance
MXSHX vs. SICIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MXSHX vs. SICIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXSHX Great-West SecureFoundation Balanced Fund | -1.95% | 12.78% | 7.76% | 13.40% | -14.56% | 11.15% | 13.55% | 18.39% | -7.74% | 12.83% |
SICIX SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund | 0.36% | 8.12% | 5.52% | 5.29% | -6.23% | 4.13% | 2.62% | 9.36% | -2.07% | 5.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXSHX achieves a -1.95% return, which is significantly lower than SICIX's 0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, MXSHX has outperformed SICIX with an annualized return of 6.30%, while SICIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.36% annualized return.
MXSHX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.15%
- YTD
- -1.95%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- 1Y
- 10.92%
- 3Y*
- 8.92%
- 5Y*
- 4.36%
- 10Y*
- 6.30%
SICIX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 5.89%
- 3Y*
- 5.80%
- 5Y*
- 3.22%
- 10Y*
- 3.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MXSHX vs. SICIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXSHX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than SICIX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MXSHX vs. SICIX — Risk / Return Rank
MXSHX
SICIX
MXSHX vs. SICIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West SecureFoundation Balanced Fund (MXSHX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXSHX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 1.66 | -0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.50 | 2.20 | -0.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.34 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 2.19 | -0.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.60 | 8.95 | -3.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXSHX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 1.66 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.84 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.87 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.78 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between MXSHX and SICIX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MXSHX vs. SICIX - Dividend Comparison
MXSHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than SICIX's 2.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXSHX Great-West SecureFoundation Balanced Fund | 3.64% | 3.57% | 7.40% | 3.48% | 6.32% | 8.80% | 5.40% | 7.08% | 6.39% | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SICIX SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund | 2.86% | 2.87% | 3.67% | 2.80% | 4.69% | 3.46% | 1.84% | 2.91% | 1.80% | 1.81% | 1.64% | 1.97% |
Drawdowns
MXSHX vs. SICIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXSHX drawdown since its inception was -23.44%, smaller than the maximum SICIX drawdown of -27.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXSHX and SICIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXSHX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.44% | -27.62% | +4.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.86% | -2.73% | -5.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.44% | -10.94% | -12.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.44% | -11.61% | -11.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.40% | -2.39% | -4.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.04% | -3.59% | -0.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 0.67% | +1.13% |
Volatility
MXSHX vs. SICIX - Volatility Comparison
Great-West SecureFoundation Balanced Fund (MXSHX) has a higher volatility of 3.66% compared to SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX) at 1.24%. This indicates that MXSHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SICIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MXSHX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 1.24% | +2.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.18% | 2.06% | +4.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.78% | 3.66% | +7.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.16% | 3.87% | +7.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.15% | 3.89% | +7.26% |