PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXSHX vs. MXCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXSHX vs. MXCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West SecureFoundation Balanced Fund (MXSHX) and Great-West Conservative Profile Fund (MXCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXSHX achieves a 7.89% return, which is significantly higher than MXCPX's 3.61% return. Over the past 10 years, MXSHX has outperformed MXCPX with an annualized return of 7.13%, while MXCPX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.95% annualized return.


MXSHX

1D
0.13%
1M
2.45%
YTD
7.89%
6M
8.60%
1Y
18.61%
3Y*
12.12%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
7.13%

MXCPX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.75%
YTD
3.61%
6M
4.11%
1Y
9.01%
3Y*
7.44%
5Y*
3.06%
10Y*
3.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXSHX vs. MXCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXSHX
Great-West SecureFoundation Balanced Fund
7.89%12.78%7.76%13.40%-14.56%11.15%13.55%18.39%-7.74%12.83%
MXCPX
Great-West Conservative Profile Fund
3.61%8.19%4.95%8.41%-10.33%6.35%8.07%11.40%-3.95%5.94%

Correlation

The correlation between MXSHX and MXCPX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2009

0.92

The correlation between MXSHX and MXCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXSHX vs. MXCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXSHX
MXSHX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
MXSHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXSHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXSHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
MXSHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXSHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

MXCPX
MXCPX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
MXCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
MXCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXSHX vs. MXCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West SecureFoundation Balanced Fund (MXSHX) and Great-West Conservative Profile Fund (MXCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXSHXMXCPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.19

2.01

+0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.17

3.00

+0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.40

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

2.40

+0.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.24

10.11

+2.13

MXSHX vs. MXCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXSHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the MXCPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXSHX and MXCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXSHXMXCPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

2.01

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.46

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.61

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.10

+0.43

Drawdowns

MXSHX vs. MXCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXSHX drawdown since its inception was -23.44%, smaller than the maximum MXCPX drawdown of -35.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXSHX and MXCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXSHXMXCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.44%

-35.02%

+11.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.40%

-3.88%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.68%

-5.57%

-5.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.44%

-17.81%

-5.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.44%

-17.81%

-5.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.12%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.01%

-12.53%

+8.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

0.92%

+0.61%

Volatility

MXSHX vs. MXCPX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West SecureFoundation Balanced Fund (MXSHX) has a higher volatility of 2.75% compared to Great-West Conservative Profile Fund (MXCPX) at 1.60%. This indicates that MXSHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXSHXMXCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.75%

1.60%

+1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.71%

3.70%

+3.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.58%

4.58%

+4.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.22%

6.72%

+4.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.21%

6.52%

+4.69%

MXSHX vs. MXCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXSHX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than MXCPX's 0.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXSHX vs. MXCPX - Dividend Comparison

MXSHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, which matches MXCPX's 3.33% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXCPX
Great-West Conservative Profile Fund
3.33%3.45%4.53%4.17%5.70%5.20%2.46%5.62%5.53%2.70%
MXSHX
Great-West SecureFoundation Balanced Fund
3.31%3.57%7.40%3.48%6.32%8.80%5.40%7.08%6.39%1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, MXSHX and MXCPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MXSHX has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to MXCPX (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXSHX dropped -23.44% vs MXCPX's -35.02%.

MXSHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXSHX and MXCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer