MXLSX vs. MXMDX
MXLSX (Great-West Small Cap Value Fund) and MXMDX (Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund) are both mutual funds - MXLSX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by Great-West, while MXMDX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Great-West. Over the past 10 years, MXLSX returned 9.27%/yr vs 9.91%/yr for MXMDX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MXLSX charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for MXMDX.
Performance
MXLSX vs. MXMDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXLSX achieves a 20.17% return, which is significantly higher than MXMDX's 14.86% return. Over the past 10 years, MXLSX has underperformed MXMDX with an annualized return of 9.27%, while MXMDX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.91% annualized return.
MXLSX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- 6M
- 14.83%
- YTD
- 20.17%
- 1Y
- 23.68%
- 3Y*
- 13.64%
- 5Y*
- 8.66%
- 10Y*
- 9.27%
MXMDX
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- YTD
- 14.86%
- 1Y
- 19.15%
- 3Y*
- 13.43%
- 5Y*
- 7.94%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
MXLSX vs. MXMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXLSX Great-West Small Cap Value Fund | 20.17% | 4.08% | 8.20% | 17.81% | -10.07% | 31.12% | 2.84% | 24.67% | -16.64% | 8.44% |
MXMDX Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund | 14.86% | 6.90% | 13.23% | 15.75% | -13.60% | 24.25% | 12.84% | 25.48% | -12.02% | 15.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXLSX and MXMDX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2011 | 0.95 |
The correlation between MXLSX and MXMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXLSX vs. MXMDX — Risk / Return Rank
MXLSX
MXMDX
MXLSX vs. MXMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Small Cap Value Fund (MXLSX) and Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXLSX | MXMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.23 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 2.23 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.87 | 7.98 | -0.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXLSX vs. MXMDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXLSX drawdown since its inception was -60.41%, which is greater than MXMDX's maximum drawdown of -41.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXLSX and MXMDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXLSX | MXMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.41% | -41.80% | -18.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.84% | -8.87% | -0.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.04% | -24.15% | -1.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -24.15% | -1.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.52% | -41.80% | -1.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | -1.83% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.10% | -5.91% | -6.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 2.45% | +0.62% |
Volatility
MXLSX vs. MXMDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Great-West Small Cap Value Fund (MXLSX) is 3.76%, while Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX) has a volatility of 4.55%. This indicates that MXLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MXMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXLSX | MXMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.76% | 4.55% | -0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.54% | 11.60% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.27% | 15.58% | +0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 19.98% | +0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.21% | 21.16% | +1.05% |
MXLSX vs. MXMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXLSX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than MXMDX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXLSX vs. MXMDX - Dividend Comparison
MXLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than MXMDX's 5.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXLSX Great-West Small Cap Value Fund | 0.40% | 0.48% | 1.07% | 2.24% | 2.93% | 6.23% | 0.23% | 0.47% | 2.92% | 5.29% |
MXMDX Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund | 5.80% | 6.66% | 3.04% | 4.76% | 4.35% | 5.24% | 5.74% | 3.74% | 8.13% | 4.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, MXLSX and MXMDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MXMDX has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to MXLSX (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXLSX dropped -60.41% vs MXMDX's -41.80%.
MXLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXLSX and MXMDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer