PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXLSX vs. MXMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXLSX vs. MXMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Small Cap Value Fund (MXLSX) and Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXLSX achieves a 14.97% return, which is significantly higher than MXMDX's 13.95% return. Over the past 10 years, MXLSX has underperformed MXMDX with an annualized return of 9.07%, while MXMDX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.11% annualized return.


MXLSX

1D
0.68%
1M
1.85%
YTD
14.97%
6M
14.60%
1Y
26.57%
3Y*
13.96%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*
9.07%

MXMDX

1D
0.88%
1M
3.94%
YTD
13.95%
6M
14.10%
1Y
24.91%
3Y*
15.50%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
10.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXLSX vs. MXMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXLSX
Great-West Small Cap Value Fund
14.97%4.08%8.20%17.81%-10.07%31.12%2.84%24.67%-16.64%8.44%
MXMDX
Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund
13.95%6.90%13.23%15.75%-13.60%24.25%12.84%25.48%-12.02%15.01%

Correlation

The correlation between MXLSX and MXMDX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2011

0.95

The correlation between MXLSX and MXMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXLSX vs. MXMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXLSX
MXLSX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
MXLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
MXLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

MXMDX
MXMDX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
MXMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
MXMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXLSX vs. MXMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Small Cap Value Fund (MXLSX) and Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXLSXMXMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.32

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

3.14

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.65

11.25

-1.60

MXLSX vs. MXMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXLSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the MXMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXLSX and MXMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXLSXMXMDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

1.82

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.39

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.48

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.45

-0.18

Drawdowns

MXLSX vs. MXMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXLSX drawdown since its inception was -60.41%, which is greater than MXMDX's maximum drawdown of -41.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXLSX and MXMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXLSXMXMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.41%

-41.80%

-18.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.84%

-8.87%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.04%

-24.15%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-24.15%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.52%

-41.80%

-1.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

0.00%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.14%

-5.95%

-6.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

2.47%

+0.64%

Volatility

MXLSX vs. MXMDX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West Small Cap Value Fund (MXLSX) and Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX) have volatilities of 4.26% and 4.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXLSXMXMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

4.44%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.34%

11.29%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.46%

15.30%

+1.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.83%

19.99%

+0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.30%

21.23%

+1.07%

MXLSX vs. MXMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXLSX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than MXMDX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXLSX vs. MXMDX - Dividend Comparison

MXLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than MXMDX's 5.84% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXLSX
Great-West Small Cap Value Fund
0.42%0.48%1.07%2.24%2.93%6.23%0.23%0.47%2.92%5.29%
MXMDX
Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund
5.84%6.66%3.04%4.76%4.35%5.24%5.74%3.74%8.13%4.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, MXLSX and MXMDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MXMDX has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to MXLSX (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXLSX dropped -60.41% vs MXMDX's -41.80%.

MXLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXLSX and MXMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer