PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXMDX vs. ALARX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXMDX vs. ALARX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX) and Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund (ALARX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXMDX achieves a 12.96% return, which is significantly lower than ALARX's 17.28% return. Over the past 10 years, MXMDX has underperformed ALARX with an annualized return of 10.01%, while ALARX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.85% annualized return.


MXMDX

1D
-0.08%
1M
2.32%
YTD
12.96%
6M
13.92%
1Y
25.35%
3Y*
15.16%
5Y*
7.42%
10Y*
10.01%

ALARX

1D
1.33%
1M
11.08%
YTD
17.28%
6M
16.47%
1Y
47.24%
3Y*
38.39%
5Y*
18.42%
10Y*
19.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXMDX vs. ALARX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXMDX
Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund
12.96%6.90%13.23%15.75%-13.60%24.25%12.84%25.48%-12.02%15.01%
ALARX
Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund
17.28%31.75%49.44%42.82%-36.88%18.38%41.50%33.13%-0.82%31.11%

Correlation

The correlation between MXMDX and ALARX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2011

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between MXMDX and ALARX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXMDX vs. ALARX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXMDX
MXMDX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
MXMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
MXMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

ALARX
ALARX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
ALARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALARX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
ALARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALARX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXMDX vs. ALARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX) and Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund (ALARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXMDXALARXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.70

2.31

-0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.48

2.94

-0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.37

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

2.61

+0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.38

8.66

+0.72

MXMDX vs. ALARX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the ALARX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXMDX and ALARX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXMDXALARXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

2.31

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.67

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.80

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.50

-0.06

Drawdowns

MXMDX vs. ALARX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXMDX drawdown since its inception was -41.80%, smaller than the maximum ALARX drawdown of -68.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXMDX and ALARX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXMDXALARXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.80%

-68.32%

+26.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.87%

-18.65%

+9.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.15%

-27.77%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.15%

-46.86%

+22.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.80%

-46.86%

+5.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

0.00%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-20.97%

+15.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

5.62%

-3.14%

Volatility

MXMDX vs. ALARX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX) is 4.38%, while Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund (ALARX) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that MXMDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXMDXALARXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

5.07%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.27%

16.03%

-4.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.31%

21.28%

-5.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.99%

27.83%

-7.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.22%

24.79%

-3.57%

MXMDX vs. ALARX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXMDX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than ALARX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXMDX vs. ALARX - Dividend Comparison

MXMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.89%, less than ALARX's 5.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALARX
Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund
5.96%6.99%13.06%8.09%3.90%19.40%16.62%10.34%12.39%6.75%0.00%7.71%
MXMDX
Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund
5.89%6.66%3.04%4.76%4.35%5.24%5.74%3.74%8.13%4.51%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXMDX and ALARX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALARX has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to MXMDX (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXMDX dropped -41.80% vs ALARX's -68.32%.

ALARX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXMDX and ALARX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer