MXIHX vs. MXMDX
MXIHX (Great-West Inflation-Protected Securities Fund) and MXMDX (Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund) are both mutual funds - MXIHX is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund managed by Great-West, while MXMDX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Great-West. Over the past 5 years, MXIHX returned 1.17%/yr vs 7.87%/yr for MXMDX. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MXIHX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for MXMDX.
Performance
MXIHX vs. MXMDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXIHX achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly lower than MXMDX's 14.38% return.
MXIHX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- 6M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 2.39%
- 3Y*
- 4.15%
- 5Y*
- 1.17%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.60%
MXMDX
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -1.03%
- 6M
- 9.95%
- YTD
- 14.38%
- 1Y
- 20.44%
- 3Y*
- 12.37%
- 5Y*
- 7.87%
- 10Y*
- 9.78%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.95%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MXIHX vs. MXMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXIHX Great-West Inflation-Protected Securities Fund | 0.54% | 6.75% | 2.80% | 4.76% | -8.95% | 4.96% | 7.36% | 6.35% | -1.22% |
MXMDX Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund | 14.38% | 6.90% | 13.23% | 15.75% | -13.60% | 24.25% | 12.84% | 25.48% | -12.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXIHX and MXMDX is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2018 | 0.10 |
The correlation between MXIHX and MXMDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXIHX vs. MXMDX — Risk / Return Rank
MXIHX
MXMDX
MXIHX vs. MXMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Inflation-Protected Securities Fund (MXIHX) and Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXIHX | MXMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.23 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | 2.19 | -1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.88 | 7.93 | -4.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXIHX vs. MXMDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXIHX drawdown since its inception was -11.51%, smaller than the maximum MXMDX drawdown of -41.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXIHX and MXMDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXIHX | MXMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.51% | -41.80% | +30.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.04% | -8.87% | +6.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.86% | -24.15% | +21.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.51% | -24.15% | +12.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -2.23% | +1.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.39% | -5.90% | +3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.59% | 2.47% | -1.88% |
Volatility
MXIHX vs. MXMDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Great-West Inflation-Protected Securities Fund (MXIHX) is 0.67%, while Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX) has a volatility of 3.47%. This indicates that MXIHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MXMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXIHX | MXMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.67% | 3.47% | -2.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.21% | 11.55% | -9.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85% | 15.41% | -12.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.85% | 19.92% | -15.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.35% | 21.17% | -16.82% |
MXIHX vs. MXMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXIHX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than MXMDX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXIHX vs. MXMDX - Dividend Comparison
MXIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, less than MXMDX's 5.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXIHX Great-West Inflation-Protected Securities Fund | 3.59% | 3.61% | 3.60% | 4.22% | 8.49% | 3.05% | 2.01% | 1.51% | 4.31% | 0.00% |
MXMDX Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund | 5.82% | 6.66% | 3.04% | 4.76% | 4.35% | 5.24% | 5.74% | 3.74% | 8.13% | 4.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXIHX and MXMDX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MXMDX has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to MXIHX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXIHX dropped -11.51% vs MXMDX's -41.80%.
MXMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXIHX and MXMDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer