MXI vs. PICK
MXI (iShares Global Materials ETF) and PICK (iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MXI is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Global Materials Index, while PICK is a Metals fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers ex Gold and Silver Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MXI returned 11.38%/yr vs 16.67%/yr for PICK. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MXI charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for PICK.
Performance
MXI vs. PICK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXI achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly lower than PICK's 17.36% return. Over the past 10 years, MXI has underperformed PICK with an annualized return of 11.38%, while PICK has yielded a comparatively higher 16.67% annualized return.
MXI
- 1D
- -2.55%
- 1M
- -2.16%
- YTD
- 11.62%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 29.81%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.60%
- 10Y*
- 11.38%
PICK
- 1D
- -4.38%
- 1M
- -5.22%
- YTD
- 17.36%
- 6M
- 17.02%
- 1Y
- 69.31%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 16.67%
MXI vs. PICK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXI iShares Global Materials ETF | 11.62% | 27.43% | -8.25% | 14.37% | -9.09% | 15.06% | 22.31% | 22.19% | -16.06% | 30.33% |
PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 17.36% | 51.89% | -16.37% | 9.69% | 2.54% | 22.61% | 27.46% | 16.47% | -18.65% | 38.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXI and PICK is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012 | 0.87 |
The correlation between MXI and PICK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
MXI vs. PICK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MXI
PICK
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
MXI
PICK
Consumer Cyclical
MXI
PICK
-
Consumer Defensive
MXI
PICK
Industrials
MXI
PICK
Communication Services
MXI
-
PICK
-
Energy
MXI
-
PICK
Financial Services
MXI
-
PICK
Healthcare
MXI
-
PICK
-
Real Estate
MXI
-
PICK
-
Technology
MXI
-
PICK
Utilities
MXI
-
PICK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXI vs. PICK — Risk / Return Rank
MXI
PICK
MXI vs. PICK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) and iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXI | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.39 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 3.56 | -1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.13 | 13.38 | -6.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXI vs. PICK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXI drawdown since its inception was -68.44%, roughly equal to the maximum PICK drawdown of -68.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXI and PICK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXI | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.44% | -68.87% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.18% | -19.54% | +3.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.25% | -32.52% | +10.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.76% | -36.37% | +7.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.52% | -52.72% | +13.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.43% | -12.59% | +5.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.03% | -24.06% | +6.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | 5.20% | -1.01% |
Volatility
MXI vs. PICK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) is 8.08%, while iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) has a volatility of 13.12%. This indicates that MXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PICK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXI | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.08% | 13.12% | -5.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.94% | 26.56% | -8.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.66% | 30.14% | -9.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 28.14% | -8.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 28.34% | -7.92% |
MXI vs. PICK - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXI has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than PICK's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXI vs. PICK - Dividend Comparison
MXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than PICK's 2.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXI iShares Global Materials ETF | 1.72% | 2.22% | 3.24% | 2.92% | 4.84% | 3.51% | 1.21% | 3.64% | 2.77% | 1.76% | 1.31% | 3.64% |
PICK iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 2.21% | 2.88% | 3.26% | 4.19% | 6.93% | 5.89% | 2.27% | 5.51% | 4.77% | 2.41% | 1.15% | 15.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXI and PICK have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PICK has higher volatility (13.12%) compared to MXI (8.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXI dropped -68.44% vs PICK's -68.87%.
On 10-year performance, PICK leads with 16.67% vs 11.38% for MXI. On fees, PICK is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, MXI has been the lower-risk option at 8.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PICK has performed better with a 16.67% return vs 11.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PICK is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for MXI.
PICK has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 1.72% for MXI.
MXI is categorized as Materials, while PICK is Metals. MXI tracks S&P Global Materials Index, while PICK tracks MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers ex Gold and Silver Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for MXI and 0.39% for PICK.
PICK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXI and PICK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer