PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXI vs. EART
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXI vs. EART - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) and Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXI achieves a 10.45% return, which is significantly higher than EART's -1.67% return.


MXI

1D
-2.15%
1M
-1.96%
6M
1.26%
YTD
10.45%
1Y
28.15%
3Y*
10.42%
5Y*
5.97%
10Y*
10.43%
ALL TIME*
6.38%

EART

1D
-0.20%
1M
-5.56%
6M
-13.83%
YTD
-1.67%
1Y
52.96%
3Y*
14.34%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$439.93K$546.94K$580.35K
$1.58M$1.75M$2.67M

MXI vs. EART - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MXI
iShares Global Materials ETF
10.45%27.43%-8.25%14.37%-5.76%
EART
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF
-1.67%98.48%-7.19%-19.75%-17.92%

Correlation

The correlation between MXI and EART is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2022

0.78

The correlation between MXI and EART has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXI vs. EART — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MXI
MXI Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXI Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
MXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXI Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

EART
EART Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
EART Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EART Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EART Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
EART Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
EART Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MXI vs. EART - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) and Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXIEARTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.23

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

1.80

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.64

4.42

+1.22

MXI vs. EART - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXI Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the EART Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXI and EART, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXI vs. EART - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXI drawdown since its inception was -68.44%, which is greater than EART's maximum drawdown of -53.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXI and EART.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXIEARTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.44%

-53.68%

-14.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.18%

-29.83%

+13.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.25%

-33.15%

+10.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.41%

-25.51%

+17.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.98%

-28.88%

+10.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.91%

12.12%

-7.21%

Volatility

MXI vs. EART - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Materials ETF (MXI) is 6.48%, while Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) has a volatility of 10.78%. This indicates that MXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EART based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXIEARTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.48%

10.78%

-4.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.38%

33.17%

-14.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.95%

40.21%

-19.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.92%

34.26%

-14.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.42%

34.26%

-13.84%

MXI vs. EART - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXI has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than EART's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXI vs. EART - Dividend Comparison

MXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than EART's 0.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EART
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF
0.69%0.65%1.06%1.83%2.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MXI
iShares Global Materials ETF
1.73%2.22%3.24%2.92%4.84%3.51%1.21%3.64%2.77%1.76%1.31%3.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXI and EART have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EART has higher volatility (10.78%) compared to MXI (6.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXI dropped -68.44% vs EART's -53.68%.

On 3-year performance, EART leads with 14.34% vs 10.42% for MXI. On fees, MXI is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, MXI has been the lower-risk option at 6.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, EART has performed better with a 14.34% return vs 10.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MXI is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EART.

MXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.69% for EART.

MXI is categorized as Materials, while EART is Rare Earth & Strategic Metals. MXI tracks S&P Global Materials Index, while EART tracks Solactive Rare Earth & Critical Materials Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for MXI and 0.59% for EART.

EART currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXI and EART

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer