MXGNX vs. JLKYX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

MXGNX (Great-West Lifetime 2060 Fund) and JLKYX (John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, MXGNX returned 7.51%/yr vs 9.85%/yr for JLKYX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MXGNX charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for JLKYX.

Performance

MXGNX vs. JLKYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Lifetime 2060 Fund (MXGNX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXGNX achieves a 11.01% return, which is significantly lower than JLKYX's 12.46% return.

MXGNX

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 1.63%
• YTD: 11.01%
• 6M: 11.45%
• 1Y: 24.03%
• 3Y*: 16.73%
• 5Y*: 7.51%
• 10Y*: —

JLKYX

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 2.21%
• YTD: 12.46%
• 6M: 12.87%
• 1Y: 28.54%
• 3Y*: 19.72%
• 5Y*: 9.85%
• 10Y*: 11.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXGNX vs. JLKYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
MXGNX Great-West Lifetime 2060 Fund	11.01%	17.97%	10.55%	17.34%	-17.97%	16.08%	13.72%	9.75%
JLKYX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio	12.46%	20.04%	15.41%	18.53%	-18.04%	18.38%	16.13%	10.52%

Correlation

The correlation between MXGNX and JLKYX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019	0.85

The correlation between MXGNX and JLKYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MXGNX vs. JLKYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXGNX

MXGNX Risk / Return Rank: 48
MXGNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
MXGNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
MXGNX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
MXGNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
MXGNX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

JLKYX

JLKYX Risk / Return Rank: 68
JLKYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
JLKYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
JLKYX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
JLKYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
JLKYX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXGNX vs. JLKYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2060 Fund (MXGNX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MXGNX	JLKYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	2.35	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	3.24	-0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.43	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.59	3.10	-0.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.88	13.76	-2.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MXGNX vs. JLKYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXGNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the JLKYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXGNX and JLKYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MXGNX	JLKYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91	2.35	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.65	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.65	-0.07

Drawdowns

MXGNX vs. JLKYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXGNX drawdown since its inception was -31.98%, roughly equal to the maximum JLKYX drawdown of -32.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXGNX and JLKYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MXGNX	JLKYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.98%	-32.55%	+0.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.28%	-9.16%	-0.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.12%	-16.11%	+0.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.60%	-25.75%	-4.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-0.42%	+0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.56%	-4.66%	-2.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.20%	2.06%	+0.14%

Volatility

MXGNX vs. JLKYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West Lifetime 2060 Fund (MXGNX) is 3.36%, while John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio (JLKYX) has a volatility of 3.56%. This indicates that MXGNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JLKYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MXGNX	JLKYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.36%	3.56%	-0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.32%	9.61%	-0.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.61%	12.08%	+0.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.96%	15.21%	+0.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.11%	16.20%	+1.91%

MXGNX vs. JLKYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXGNX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than JLKYX's 0.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

MXGNX vs. JLKYX - Dividend Comparison

MXGNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, more than JLKYX's 3.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JLKYX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2055 Lifetime Portfolio	3.21%	3.61%	1.77%	2.16%	8.08%	5.71%	3.88%	8.54%	10.69%	4.33%	3.23%	1.75%
MXGNX Great-West Lifetime 2060 Fund	6.56%	7.28%	6.42%	4.74%	7.99%	8.55%	5.26%	2.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MXGNX and JLKYX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, MXGNX and JLKYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MXGNX or JLKYX?

JLKYX has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to MXGNX (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXGNX dropped -31.98% vs JLKYX's -32.55%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JLKYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.