PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXGNX vs. FFGZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXGNX vs. FFGZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Lifetime 2060 Fund (MXGNX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXGNX achieves a 10.92% return, which is significantly higher than FFGZX's 3.16% return.


MXGNX

1D
1.71%
1M
0.00%
6M
7.47%
YTD
10.92%
1Y
21.16%
3Y*
14.24%
5Y*
7.44%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.19%

FFGZX

1D
0.56%
1M
-0.47%
6M
2.17%
YTD
3.16%
1Y
6.99%
3Y*
6.83%
5Y*
2.70%
10Y*
4.03%
ALL TIME*
3.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MXGNX vs. FFGZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MXGNX
Great-West Lifetime 2060 Fund
10.92%17.97%10.55%17.34%-17.97%16.08%13.72%9.75%
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
3.16%9.13%5.02%8.32%-11.07%2.85%8.59%5.42%

Correlation

The correlation between MXGNX and FFGZX is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2019

0.61

Over the past year, MXGNX and FFGZX have become more correlated (0.81) than their long-term average of 0.61, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXGNX vs. FFGZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MXGNX
MXGNX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
MXGNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXGNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXGNX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MXGNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXGNX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FFGZX
FFGZX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FFGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MXGNX vs. FFGZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2060 Fund (MXGNX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXGNXFFGZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.31

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

2.16

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.54

8.81

-0.27

MXGNX vs. FFGZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXGNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the FFGZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXGNX and FFGZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXGNX vs. FFGZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXGNX drawdown since its inception was -31.98%, which is greater than FFGZX's maximum drawdown of -14.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXGNX and FFGZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXGNXFFGZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.98%

-14.94%

-17.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-3.33%

-5.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.12%

-3.82%

-11.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.60%

-14.94%

-15.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-1.07%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.43%

-2.24%

-5.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

0.82%

+1.43%

Volatility

MXGNX vs. FFGZX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West Lifetime 2060 Fund (MXGNX) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX) at 1.37%. This indicates that MXGNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFGZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXGNXFFGZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

1.37%

+1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.36%

3.86%

+6.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.45%

4.47%

+8.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.06%

5.17%

+10.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.04%

4.47%

+13.57%

MXGNX vs. FFGZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXGNX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than FFGZX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXGNX vs. FFGZX - Dividend Comparison

MXGNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, more than FFGZX's 3.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
2.76%3.30%3.18%2.88%3.11%2.10%2.22%7.35%3.00%1.95%1.56%1.06%
MXGNX
Great-West Lifetime 2060 Fund
6.56%7.28%6.42%4.74%7.99%8.55%5.26%2.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXGNX and FFGZX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXGNX has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to FFGZX (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXGNX dropped -31.98% vs FFGZX's -14.94%.

FFGZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXGNX and FFGZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer