PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXFIX vs. BGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXFIX vs. BGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay Floating Rate Fund (MXFIX) and BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXFIX achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly higher than BGT's -0.49% return. Over the past 10 years, MXFIX has underperformed BGT with an annualized return of 4.61%, while BGT has yielded a comparatively higher 6.13% annualized return.


MXFIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.54%
YTD
0.99%
6M
1.60%
1Y
4.65%
3Y*
7.11%
5Y*
5.09%
10Y*
4.61%

BGT

1D
-0.65%
1M
-0.58%
YTD
-0.49%
6M
1.38%
1Y
-1.80%
3Y*
10.35%
5Y*
6.89%
10Y*
6.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXFIX vs. BGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXFIX
MainStay Floating Rate Fund
0.99%5.47%7.80%11.43%-1.27%3.40%2.65%8.46%-0.41%4.06%
BGT
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust
-0.49%-0.84%16.12%26.29%-16.57%25.89%-0.81%18.97%-11.95%3.91%

Correlation

The correlation between MXFIX and BGT is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2004

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXFIX vs. BGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXFIX
MXFIX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
MXFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
MXFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

BGT
BGT Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXFIX vs. BGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay Floating Rate Fund (MXFIX) and BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MXFIXBGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

0.98

+0.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

-0.16

+2.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.62

-0.36

+8.98

MXFIX vs. BGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the BGT Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXFIX and BGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MXFIXBGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

-0.17

+2.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.90

0.51

+1.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.21

0.40

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.24

0.29

+0.95

Drawdowns

MXFIX vs. BGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXFIX drawdown since its inception was -25.01%, smaller than the maximum BGT drawdown of -58.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXFIX and BGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXFIXBGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.01%

-58.06%

+33.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.73%

-11.06%

+9.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.57%

-15.91%

+13.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.34%

-23.19%

+16.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.09%

-41.90%

+21.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.56%

+6.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.21%

-8.12%

+6.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

4.99%

-4.45%

Volatility

MXFIX vs. BGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MainStay Floating Rate Fund (MXFIX) is 0.59%, while BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) has a volatility of 1.63%. This indicates that MXFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXFIXBGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.59%

1.63%

-1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.90%

7.13%

-5.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45%

10.35%

-7.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.69%

13.57%

-10.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.82%

15.34%

-11.52%

MXFIX vs. BGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXFIX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than BGT's 1.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXFIX vs. BGT - Dividend Comparison

MXFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.17%, less than BGT's 13.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGT
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust
13.51%12.74%11.22%10.36%6.87%5.55%7.58%6.33%6.64%5.03%5.03%6.04%
MXFIX
MainStay Floating Rate Fund
7.17%7.41%7.49%7.50%4.51%2.90%3.46%4.87%4.85%4.09%3.75%3.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXFIX and BGT have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BGT has higher volatility (1.63%) compared to MXFIX (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXFIX dropped -25.01% vs BGT's -58.06%.

MXFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXFIX and BGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer