MXDPX vs. TSAIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Great-West Moderately Conservative Profile Fund (MXDPX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX).
MXDPX is managed by Great-West. It was launched on Sep 26, 1999. TSAIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Dec 8, 2011.
Performance
MXDPX vs. TSAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MXDPX vs. TSAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXDPX Great-West Moderately Conservative Profile Fund | -0.12% | 10.02% | 6.17% | 10.19% | -11.44% | 9.24% | 9.30% | 14.91% | -5.19% | 8.25% |
TSAIX TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund | -3.02% | 20.04% | 15.46% | 22.72% | -19.57% | 17.10% | 19.69% | 27.97% | -11.27% | 22.35% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXDPX achieves a -0.12% return, which is significantly higher than TSAIX's -3.02% return. Over the past 10 years, MXDPX has underperformed TSAIX with an annualized return of 4.93%, while TSAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.88% annualized return.
MXDPX
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- -3.35%
- YTD
- -0.12%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- 8.54%
- 3Y*
- 7.61%
- 5Y*
- 3.82%
- 10Y*
- 4.93%
TSAIX
- 1D
- 3.07%
- 1M
- -6.27%
- YTD
- -3.02%
- 6M
- -0.43%
- 1Y
- 18.56%
- 3Y*
- 15.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.78%
- 10Y*
- 10.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MXDPX vs. TSAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXDPX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than TSAIX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MXDPX vs. TSAIX — Risk / Return Rank
MXDPX
TSAIX
MXDPX vs. TSAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Moderately Conservative Profile Fund (MXDPX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXDPX | TSAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.04 | 1.10 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.49 | 1.62 | -0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.24 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 1.45 | +0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.70 | 6.28 | -0.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXDPX | TSAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 1.10 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.48 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.62 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.67 | -0.54 |
Correlation
The correlation between MXDPX and TSAIX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MXDPX vs. TSAIX - Dividend Comparison
MXDPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, less than TSAIX's 7.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXDPX Great-West Moderately Conservative Profile Fund | 5.28% | 5.27% | 4.86% | 5.29% | 6.69% | 6.84% | 2.38% | 7.36% | 7.84% | 2.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSAIX TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund | 7.61% | 7.38% | 2.94% | 1.81% | 9.27% | 11.82% | 5.59% | 5.71% | 5.71% | 1.13% | 4.12% | 7.19% |
Drawdowns
MXDPX vs. TSAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXDPX drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, which is greater than TSAIX's maximum drawdown of -34.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXDPX and TSAIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXDPX | TSAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.33% | -34.58% | -4.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.89% | -11.72% | +5.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.55% | -28.28% | +7.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.55% | -34.58% | +14.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.79% | -7.52% | +3.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.02% | -4.96% | -9.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.52% | 2.71% | -1.19% |
Volatility
MXDPX vs. TSAIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Great-West Moderately Conservative Profile Fund (MXDPX) is 2.87%, while TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX) has a volatility of 6.34%. This indicates that MXDPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MXDPX | TSAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 6.34% | -3.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.14% | 10.26% | -5.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.41% | 17.32% | -8.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.03% | 16.20% | -7.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.87% | 17.62% | -8.75% |