MXCPX vs. SICIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Great-West Conservative Profile Fund (MXCPX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX).
MXCPX is managed by Great-West. It was launched on Sep 29, 1999. SICIX is managed by SEI. It was launched on Nov 16, 2003.
Performance
MXCPX vs. SICIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MXCPX vs. SICIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXCPX Great-West Conservative Profile Fund | -0.90% | 8.19% | 4.95% | 8.41% | -10.33% | 6.35% | 8.07% | 11.40% | -3.95% | 5.94% |
SICIX SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund | 0.36% | 8.12% | 5.52% | 5.29% | -6.23% | 4.13% | 2.62% | 9.36% | -2.07% | 5.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXCPX achieves a -0.90% return, which is significantly lower than SICIX's 0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, MXCPX has outperformed SICIX with an annualized return of 3.62%, while SICIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.36% annualized return.
MXCPX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -3.75%
- YTD
- -0.90%
- 6M
- 0.33%
- 1Y
- 5.79%
- 3Y*
- 5.91%
- 5Y*
- 2.72%
- 10Y*
- 3.62%
SICIX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 5.89%
- 3Y*
- 5.80%
- 5Y*
- 3.22%
- 10Y*
- 3.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MXCPX vs. SICIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXCPX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than SICIX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MXCPX vs. SICIX — Risk / Return Rank
MXCPX
SICIX
MXCPX vs. SICIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Conservative Profile Fund (MXCPX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXCPX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.13 | 1.66 | -0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.57 | 2.20 | -0.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.34 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 2.19 | -0.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.54 | 8.95 | -3.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXCPX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 1.66 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.84 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.87 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.78 | -0.70 |
Correlation
The correlation between MXCPX and SICIX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MXCPX vs. SICIX - Dividend Comparison
MXCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than SICIX's 2.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXCPX Great-West Conservative Profile Fund | 3.49% | 3.45% | 4.53% | 4.17% | 5.70% | 5.20% | 2.46% | 5.62% | 5.53% | 2.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SICIX SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund | 2.86% | 2.87% | 3.67% | 2.80% | 4.69% | 3.46% | 1.84% | 2.91% | 1.80% | 1.81% | 1.64% | 1.97% |
Drawdowns
MXCPX vs. SICIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXCPX drawdown since its inception was -35.02%, which is greater than SICIX's maximum drawdown of -27.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXCPX and SICIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXCPX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.02% | -27.62% | -7.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.11% | -2.73% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.81% | -10.94% | -6.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.81% | -11.61% | -6.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.75% | -2.39% | -1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.61% | -3.59% | -9.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | 0.67% | +0.35% |
Volatility
MXCPX vs. SICIX - Volatility Comparison
Great-West Conservative Profile Fund (MXCPX) has a higher volatility of 1.97% compared to SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX) at 1.24%. This indicates that MXCPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SICIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MXCPX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.97% | 1.24% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.19% | 2.06% | +1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.27% | 3.66% | +1.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.68% | 3.87% | +2.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.49% | 3.89% | +2.60% |