MXCPX vs. MXMDX
MXCPX (Great-West Conservative Profile Fund) and MXMDX (Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund) are both mutual funds - MXCPX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Great-West, while MXMDX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Great-West. Over the past 10 years, MXCPX returned 4.00%/yr vs 10.26%/yr for MXMDX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MXCPX charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for MXMDX.
Performance
MXCPX vs. MXMDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXCPX achieves a 4.12% return, which is significantly lower than MXMDX's 15.14% return. Over the past 10 years, MXCPX has underperformed MXMDX with an annualized return of 4.00%, while MXMDX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.26% annualized return.
MXCPX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 4.12%
- 6M
- 3.97%
- 1Y
- 9.26%
- 3Y*
- 7.28%
- 5Y*
- 3.33%
- 10Y*
- 4.00%
MXMDX
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- 3.32%
- YTD
- 15.14%
- 6M
- 12.60%
- 1Y
- 26.46%
- 3Y*
- 14.75%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 10.26%
MXCPX vs. MXMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXCPX Great-West Conservative Profile Fund | 4.12% | 8.19% | 4.95% | 8.41% | -10.33% | 6.35% | 8.07% | 11.40% | -3.95% | 5.94% |
MXMDX Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund | 15.14% | 6.90% | 13.23% | 15.75% | -13.60% | 24.25% | 12.84% | 25.48% | -12.02% | 15.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXCPX and MXMDX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2011 | 0.75 |
The correlation between MXCPX and MXMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXCPX vs. MXMDX — Risk / Return Rank
MXCPX
MXMDX
MXCPX vs. MXMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Conservative Profile Fund (MXCPX) and Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXCPX | MXMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.31 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | 3.11 | -0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.07 | 11.15 | -1.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXCPX vs. MXMDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXCPX drawdown since its inception was -35.02%, smaller than the maximum MXMDX drawdown of -41.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXCPX and MXMDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXCPX | MXMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.02% | -41.80% | +6.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.88% | -8.87% | +4.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.57% | -24.15% | +18.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.81% | -24.15% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.81% | -41.80% | +23.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -0.41% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.51% | -5.93% | -6.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 2.43% | -1.51% |
Volatility
MXCPX vs. MXMDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Great-West Conservative Profile Fund (MXCPX) is 1.70%, while Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund (MXMDX) has a volatility of 4.88%. This indicates that MXCPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MXMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXCPX | MXMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.70% | 4.88% | -3.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.90% | 11.68% | -7.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.74% | 15.64% | -10.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.74% | 20.03% | -13.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.53% | 21.25% | -14.72% |
MXCPX vs. MXMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXCPX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than MXMDX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXCPX vs. MXMDX - Dividend Comparison
MXCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, less than MXMDX's 5.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXCPX Great-West Conservative Profile Fund | 3.32% | 3.45% | 4.53% | 4.17% | 5.70% | 5.20% | 2.46% | 5.62% | 5.53% | 2.70% |
MXMDX Great-West S&P Mid Cap 400 Index Fund | 5.78% | 6.66% | 3.04% | 4.76% | 4.35% | 5.24% | 5.74% | 3.74% | 8.13% | 4.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXCPX and MXMDX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MXMDX has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to MXCPX (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXCPX dropped -35.02% vs MXMDX's -41.80%.
MXCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXCPX and MXMDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer