MXCPX vs. FSRRX
MXCPX (Great-West Conservative Profile Fund) and FSRRX (Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, MXCPX returned 3.91%/yr vs 5.49%/yr for FSRRX. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MXCPX charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FSRRX.
Performance
MXCPX vs. FSRRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXCPX achieves a 4.25% return, which is significantly lower than FSRRX's 8.37% return. Over the past 10 years, MXCPX has underperformed FSRRX with an annualized return of 3.91%, while FSRRX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.49% annualized return.
MXCPX
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- 6M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 4.25%
- 1Y
- 8.26%
- 3Y*
- 6.83%
- 5Y*
- 3.06%
- 10Y*
- 3.91%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.69%
FSRRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- 6M
- 4.71%
- YTD
- 8.37%
- 1Y
- 14.75%
- 3Y*
- 8.64%
- 5Y*
- 5.82%
- 10Y*
- 5.49%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.03%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MXCPX vs. FSRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXCPX Great-West Conservative Profile Fund | 4.25% | 8.19% | 4.95% | 8.41% | -10.33% | 6.35% | 8.07% | 11.40% | -3.95% | 5.94% |
FSRRX Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund | 8.37% | 10.45% | 5.84% | 4.59% | -3.34% | 15.84% | 3.74% | 10.48% | -3.99% | 3.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXCPX and FSRRX is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2005 | 0.59 |
The correlation between MXCPX and FSRRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXCPX vs. FSRRX — Risk / Return Rank
MXCPX
FSRRX
MXCPX vs. FSRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Conservative Profile Fund (MXCPX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXCPX | FSRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.57 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 4.14 | -2.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.50 | 14.82 | -6.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXCPX vs. FSRRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXCPX drawdown since its inception was -35.02%, roughly equal to the maximum FSRRX drawdown of -33.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXCPX and FSRRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXCPX | FSRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.02% | -33.42% | -1.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.88% | -3.42% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.80% | -5.80% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.81% | -12.78% | -5.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.81% | -19.93% | +2.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -1.01% | +0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.46% | -4.20% | -8.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 0.95% | -0.02% |
Volatility
MXCPX vs. FSRRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Great-West Conservative Profile Fund (MXCPX) is 1.07%, while Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX) has a volatility of 1.25%. This indicates that MXCPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXCPX | FSRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | 1.25% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.92% | 3.77% | +0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.76% | 4.90% | -0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.74% | 6.87% | -0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.50% | 6.72% | -0.22% |
MXCPX vs. FSRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXCPX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than FSRRX's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXCPX vs. FSRRX - Dividend Comparison
MXCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, less than FSRRX's 4.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSRRX Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund | 4.58% | 4.68% | 4.82% | 5.29% | 7.31% | 5.35% | 2.25% | 3.05% | 9.39% | 1.57% | 2.34% | 1.75% |
MXCPX Great-West Conservative Profile Fund | 3.31% | 3.45% | 4.53% | 4.17% | 5.70% | 5.20% | 2.46% | 5.62% | 5.53% | 2.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXCPX and FSRRX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSRRX has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to MXCPX (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXCPX dropped -35.02% vs FSRRX's -33.42%.
FSRRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXCPX and FSRRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer