MXBSX vs. FFFCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX).
MXBSX is managed by Great-West. It was launched on Apr 27, 2016. FFFCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 17, 1996.
Performance
MXBSX vs. FFFCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MXBSX vs. FFFCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXBSX Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund | -1.35% | 17.70% | 11.16% | 17.79% | -16.61% | 16.82% | 13.96% | 26.31% | -10.30% | 20.41% |
FFFCX Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund | 0.41% | 11.39% | 5.26% | 9.82% | -13.21% | 5.64% | 11.09% | 14.34% | -3.74% | 12.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXBSX achieves a -1.35% return, which is significantly lower than FFFCX's 0.41% return.
MXBSX
- 1D
- 2.56%
- 1M
- -5.69%
- YTD
- -1.35%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 16.01%
- 3Y*
- 12.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.89%
- 10Y*
- —
FFFCX
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- -2.43%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 9.26%
- 3Y*
- 7.44%
- 5Y*
- 3.17%
- 10Y*
- 5.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MXBSX vs. FFFCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXBSX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FFFCX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MXBSX vs. FFFCX — Risk / Return Rank
MXBSX
FFFCX
MXBSX vs. FFFCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MXBSX | FFFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | 1.73 | -0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | 2.41 | -0.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.36 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 2.39 | -0.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.47 | 9.45 | -2.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MXBSX | FFFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 1.73 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.50 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.67 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between MXBSX and FFFCX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MXBSX vs. FFFCX - Dividend Comparison
MXBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.34%, more than FFFCX's 4.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXBSX Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund | 5.34% | 5.27% | 7.38% | 5.63% | 10.66% | 11.14% | 6.57% | 9.46% | 8.18% | 3.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FFFCX Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund | 4.95% | 4.97% | 2.99% | 2.72% | 7.23% | 9.33% | 6.01% | 5.78% | 6.98% | 4.82% | 3.22% | 3.68% |
Drawdowns
MXBSX vs. FFFCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXBSX drawdown since its inception was -31.88%, smaller than the maximum FFFCX drawdown of -36.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXBSX and FFFCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXBSX | FFFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.88% | -36.88% | +5.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.16% | -4.00% | -7.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.68% | -18.35% | -11.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.47% | -2.82% | -3.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.02% | -4.60% | -1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 1.01% | +1.50% |
Volatility
MXBSX vs. FFFCX - Volatility Comparison
Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX) at 2.59%. This indicates that MXBSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFFCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MXBSX | FFFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.49% | 2.59% | +2.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.19% | 3.56% | +5.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.96% | 5.56% | +10.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.87% | 6.33% | +9.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 6.28% | +10.10% |