MXBPX vs. MXXLX
MXBPX (Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund) and MXXLX (Great-West Lifetime 2055 Fund) are both mutual funds - MXBPX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Great-West, while MXXLX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Great-West. Over the past 10 years, MXBPX returned 7.79%/yr vs 9.85%/yr for MXXLX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MXBPX charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for MXXLX.
Performance
MXBPX vs. MXXLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXBPX achieves a 7.77% return, which is significantly lower than MXXLX's 9.23% return. Over the past 10 years, MXBPX has underperformed MXXLX with an annualized return of 7.79%, while MXXLX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.85% annualized return.
MXBPX
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 7.77%
- 6M
- 6.90%
- 1Y
- 16.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.77%
- 5Y*
- 6.44%
- 10Y*
- 7.79%
MXXLX
- 1D
- -1.62%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 9.23%
- 6M
- 8.24%
- 1Y
- 21.21%
- 3Y*
- 15.32%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- 9.85%
MXBPX vs. MXXLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXBPX Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund | 7.77% | 13.78% | 9.00% | 13.96% | -13.04% | 14.39% | 11.44% | 20.91% | -8.67% | 13.52% |
MXXLX Great-West Lifetime 2055 Fund | 9.23% | 17.54% | 10.65% | 17.25% | -17.19% | 16.12% | 13.57% | 25.75% | -13.05% | 21.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXBPX and MXXLX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2009 | 0.97 |
The correlation between MXBPX and MXXLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXBPX vs. MXXLX — Risk / Return Rank
MXBPX
MXXLX
MXBPX vs. MXXLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund (MXBPX) and Great-West Lifetime 2055 Fund (MXXLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXBPX | MXXLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.31 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 2.34 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.18 | 9.88 | -1.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXBPX vs. MXXLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXBPX drawdown since its inception was -55.80%, which is greater than MXXLX's maximum drawdown of -33.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXBPX and MXXLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXBPX | MXXLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.80% | -33.59% | -22.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.12% | -9.11% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.46% | -15.05% | +3.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.51% | -28.94% | +3.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.63% | -33.59% | +4.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | -1.84% | +0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.94% | -7.01% | -13.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 2.15% | -0.10% |
Volatility
MXBPX vs. MXXLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund (MXBPX) is 3.61%, while Great-West Lifetime 2055 Fund (MXXLX) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that MXBPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MXXLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXBPX | MXXLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | 4.75% | -1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.73% | 10.05% | -2.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.51% | 12.64% | -1.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.50% | 15.70% | -2.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.68% | 16.42% | -2.74% |
MXBPX vs. MXXLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXBPX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than MXXLX's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXBPX vs. MXXLX - Dividend Comparison
MXBPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.50%, more than MXXLX's 2.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXBPX Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund | 5.50% | 5.92% | 6.18% | 5.45% | 9.89% | 9.76% | 8.52% | 11.28% | 12.07% | 4.47% |
MXXLX Great-West Lifetime 2055 Fund | 2.72% | 2.97% | 4.27% | 3.42% | 7.87% | 8.92% | 5.05% | 9.47% | 10.16% | 2.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, MXBPX and MXXLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MXXLX has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to MXBPX (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXBPX dropped -55.80% vs MXXLX's -33.59%.
MXXLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXBPX and MXXLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer