PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXBGX vs. TDIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXBGX vs. TDIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Lifetime 2040 Fund (MXBGX) and Dimensional Retirement Income Fund (TDIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXBGX achieves a 9.12% return, which is significantly higher than TDIFX's 3.13% return. Over the past 10 years, MXBGX has outperformed TDIFX with an annualized return of 9.25%, while TDIFX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.91% annualized return.


MXBGX

1D
1.33%
1M
-0.08%
6M
6.34%
YTD
9.12%
1Y
18.08%
3Y*
13.04%
5Y*
7.09%
10Y*
9.25%
ALL TIME*
9.58%

TDIFX

1D
0.33%
1M
-0.24%
6M
2.11%
YTD
3.13%
1Y
6.56%
3Y*
6.30%
5Y*
4.53%
10Y*
4.91%
ALL TIME*
5.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MXBGX vs. TDIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXBGX
Great-West Lifetime 2040 Fund
9.12%16.19%10.17%16.47%-15.90%15.69%13.61%25.22%-9.48%18.42%
TDIFX
Dimensional Retirement Income Fund
3.13%7.22%6.21%7.76%-9.37%14.53%9.33%9.96%-1.98%5.17%

Correlation

The correlation between MXBGX and TDIFX is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2016

0.63

The correlation between MXBGX and TDIFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (10 years) to 0.79 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXBGX vs. TDIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MXBGX
MXBGX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
MXBGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXBGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXBGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MXBGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXBGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

TDIFX
TDIFX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
TDIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MXBGX vs. TDIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2040 Fund (MXBGX) and Dimensional Retirement Income Fund (TDIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXBGXTDIFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.36

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

2.57

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.52

10.69

-2.17

MXBGX vs. TDIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXBGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the TDIFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXBGX and TDIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXBGX vs. TDIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXBGX drawdown since its inception was -30.12%, which is greater than TDIFX's maximum drawdown of -12.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXBGX and TDIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXBGXTDIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.12%

-12.21%

-17.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.98%

-2.61%

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.05%

-3.51%

-9.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.13%

-12.21%

-15.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.12%

-12.21%

-17.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-0.72%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.53%

-1.73%

-3.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

0.61%

+1.33%

Volatility

MXBGX vs. TDIFX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West Lifetime 2040 Fund (MXBGX) has a higher volatility of 2.72% compared to Dimensional Retirement Income Fund (TDIFX) at 0.88%. This indicates that MXBGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXBGXTDIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.72%

0.88%

+1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.79%

2.80%

+5.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.61%

3.51%

+8.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.49%

5.91%

+8.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.06%

5.07%

+9.99%

MXBGX vs. TDIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXBGX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than TDIFX's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MXBGX vs. TDIFX - Dividend Comparison

MXBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than TDIFX's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MXBGX
Great-West Lifetime 2040 Fund
4.60%5.02%6.86%5.77%11.05%10.66%6.43%9.53%7.86%5.21%0.00%
TDIFX
Dimensional Retirement Income Fund
3.26%1.77%3.11%3.09%4.66%9.39%1.39%1.98%2.11%0.98%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXBGX and TDIFX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXBGX has higher volatility (2.72%) compared to TDIFX (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXBGX dropped -30.12% vs TDIFX's -12.21%.

TDIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXBGX and TDIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer