MXBGX vs. LTSTX

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

MXBGX (Great-West Lifetime 2040 Fund) and LTSTX (Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, MXBGX returned 9.22%/yr vs 7.79%/yr for LTSTX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MXBGX charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for LTSTX.

Performance

MXBGX vs. LTSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Lifetime 2040 Fund (MXBGX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXBGX achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly higher than LTSTX's 3.37% return. Over the past 10 years, MXBGX has outperformed LTSTX with an annualized return of 9.22%, while LTSTX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.79% annualized return.

MXBGX

• 1D: -2.24%
• 1M: -0.71%
• YTD: 6.76%
• 6M: 7.46%
• 1Y: 17.67%
• 3Y*: 14.08%
• 5Y*: 6.77%
• 10Y*: 9.22%

LTSTX

• 1D: -1.56%
• 1M: -0.61%
• YTD: 3.37%
• 6M: 3.84%
• 1Y: 11.38%
• 3Y*: 11.61%
• 5Y*: 5.17%
• 10Y*: 7.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXBGX vs. LTSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MXBGX Great-West Lifetime 2040 Fund	6.76%	16.19%	10.17%	16.47%	-15.90%	15.69%	13.61%	25.22%	-9.48%	18.42%
LTSTX Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund	3.37%	12.16%	11.91%	13.30%	-15.23%	10.91%	13.70%	20.50%	-6.41%	16.75%

Correlation

The correlation between MXBGX and LTSTX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2016	0.81

The correlation between MXBGX and LTSTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MXBGX vs. LTSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXBGX

MXBGX Risk / Return Rank: 45
MXBGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
MXBGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
MXBGX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
MXBGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
MXBGX Martin Ratio Rank: 54

LTSTX

LTSTX Risk / Return Rank: 44
LTSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
LTSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
LTSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
LTSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
LTSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXBGX vs. LTSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifetime 2040 Fund (MXBGX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MXBGX	LTSTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	1.70	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.32	2.41	-0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.32	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.30	2.22	+0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.60	9.96	-0.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MXBGX vs. LTSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXBGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the LTSTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXBGX and LTSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MXBGX	LTSTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.64	1.70	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.56	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	0.79	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.48	+0.16

Drawdowns

MXBGX vs. LTSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXBGX drawdown since its inception was -30.12%, smaller than the maximum LTSTX drawdown of -48.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXBGX and LTSTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MXBGX	LTSTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.12%	-48.17%	+18.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.98%	-5.24%	-2.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.05%	-8.12%	-4.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.13%	-21.01%	-7.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.12%	-23.33%	-6.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.32%	-1.73%	-0.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.60%	-6.15%	+0.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.91%	1.16%	+0.75%

Volatility

MXBGX vs. LTSTX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West Lifetime 2040 Fund (MXBGX) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX) at 2.44%. This indicates that MXBGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MXBGX	LTSTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.47%	2.44%	+1.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.29%	5.64%	+2.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.18%	6.85%	+4.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.46%	9.20%	+5.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.13%	9.84%	+5.29%

MXBGX vs. LTSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXBGX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than LTSTX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MXBGX vs. LTSTX - Dividend Comparison

MXBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, less than LTSTX's 11.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LTSTX Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund	11.79%	12.19%	9.74%	4.26%	8.00%	7.66%	5.25%	6.91%	6.39%	4.75%	3.65%	8.91%
MXBGX Great-West Lifetime 2040 Fund	4.70%	5.02%	6.86%	5.77%	11.05%	10.66%	6.43%	9.53%	7.86%	5.21%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MXBGX and LTSTX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, MXBGX and LTSTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MXBGX or LTSTX?

MXBGX has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to LTSTX (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXBGX dropped -30.12% vs LTSTX's -48.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LTSTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.