PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXAPX vs. PUDZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXAPX vs. PUDZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Aggressive Profile Fund (MXAPX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXAPX achieves a 11.92% return, which is significantly higher than PUDZX's 10.63% return. Over the past 10 years, MXAPX has outperformed PUDZX with an annualized return of 9.36%, while PUDZX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.64% annualized return.


MXAPX

1D
0.30%
1M
2.58%
YTD
11.92%
6M
11.17%
1Y
24.12%
3Y*
16.88%
5Y*
8.60%
10Y*
9.36%

PUDZX

1D
0.19%
1M
-3.13%
YTD
10.63%
6M
10.02%
1Y
17.66%
3Y*
12.74%
5Y*
7.67%
10Y*
6.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXAPX vs. PUDZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXAPX
Great-West Aggressive Profile Fund
11.92%17.41%11.49%17.41%-16.14%19.63%11.52%25.35%-12.94%19.22%
PUDZX
PGIM Real Assets Fund
10.63%13.40%8.61%3.26%-2.76%18.49%4.84%16.29%-9.20%6.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MXAPX and PUDZX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011

0.62

The correlation between MXAPX and PUDZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXAPX vs. PUDZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXAPX
MXAPX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
MXAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
MXAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

PUDZX
PUDZX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PUDZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUDZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUDZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
PUDZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUDZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXAPX vs. PUDZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Aggressive Profile Fund (MXAPX) and PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXAPXPUDZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.42

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

4.05

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.29

14.27

-6.98

MXAPX vs. PUDZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXAPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the PUDZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXAPX and PUDZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXAPX vs. PUDZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXAPX drawdown since its inception was -70.73%, which is greater than PUDZX's maximum drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXAPX and PUDZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXAPXPUDZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.73%

-21.53%

-49.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.15%

-4.38%

-4.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.54%

-8.20%

-7.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.50%

-17.98%

-14.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.94%

-21.53%

-16.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-4.19%

+4.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.45%

-5.25%

-23.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

1.24%

+2.22%

Volatility

MXAPX vs. PUDZX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West Aggressive Profile Fund (MXAPX) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX) at 2.03%. This indicates that MXAPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PUDZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXAPXPUDZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

2.03%

+2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.99%

6.18%

+3.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.03%

7.69%

+10.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.61%

10.49%

+8.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.67%

9.70%

+9.97%

MXAPX vs. PUDZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXAPX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than PUDZX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXAPX vs. PUDZX - Dividend Comparison

MXAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.03%, more than PUDZX's 7.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MXAPX
Great-West Aggressive Profile Fund
8.03%8.99%8.09%5.68%13.27%13.88%4.31%14.52%15.76%6.79%0.00%0.00%
PUDZX
PGIM Real Assets Fund
7.90%8.93%6.67%3.66%9.10%13.00%4.94%3.40%2.14%2.10%1.39%1.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXAPX and PUDZX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXAPX has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to PUDZX (2.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXAPX dropped -70.73% vs PUDZX's -21.53%.

PUDZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXAPX and PUDZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer