PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXAPX vs. MXBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXAPX vs. MXBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Aggressive Profile Fund (MXAPX) and Great-West Bond Index Fund (MXBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXAPX achieves a 11.92% return, which is significantly higher than MXBIX's 0.15% return. Over the past 10 years, MXAPX has outperformed MXBIX with an annualized return of 9.36%, while MXBIX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.92% annualized return.


MXAPX

1D
0.30%
1M
2.58%
YTD
11.92%
6M
11.17%
1Y
24.12%
3Y*
16.88%
5Y*
8.60%
10Y*
9.36%

MXBIX

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.54%
YTD
0.15%
6M
0.23%
1Y
3.73%
3Y*
3.42%
5Y*
-0.53%
10Y*
0.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MXAPX vs. MXBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXAPX
Great-West Aggressive Profile Fund
11.92%17.41%11.49%17.41%-16.14%19.63%11.52%25.35%-12.94%19.22%
MXBIX
Great-West Bond Index Fund
0.15%6.62%0.82%5.02%-13.69%-2.33%7.10%8.09%-0.26%2.56%

Correlation

The correlation between MXAPX and MXBIX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 1999

-0.15

The correlation between MXAPX and MXBIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXAPX vs. MXBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MXAPX
MXAPX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
MXAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
MXAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

MXBIX
MXBIX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
MXBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
MXBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MXAPX vs. MXBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Aggressive Profile Fund (MXAPX) and Great-West Bond Index Fund (MXBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXAPXMXBIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.20

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

1.46

+1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.29

4.06

+3.23

MXAPX vs. MXBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXAPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the MXBIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXAPX and MXBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXAPX vs. MXBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXAPX drawdown since its inception was -70.73%, which is greater than MXBIX's maximum drawdown of -19.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXAPX and MXBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXAPXMXBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.73%

-19.74%

-50.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.15%

-2.87%

-6.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.54%

-6.35%

-9.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.50%

-18.70%

-13.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.94%

-19.74%

-18.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-5.41%

+5.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.45%

-5.88%

-22.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

1.02%

+2.44%

Volatility

MXAPX vs. MXBIX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West Aggressive Profile Fund (MXAPX) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to Great-West Bond Index Fund (MXBIX) at 1.03%. This indicates that MXAPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXAPXMXBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

1.03%

+3.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.99%

2.70%

+7.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.03%

3.72%

+14.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.61%

6.05%

+12.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.67%

4.94%

+14.73%

MXAPX vs. MXBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXAPX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than MXBIX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXAPX vs. MXBIX - Dividend Comparison

MXAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.03%, more than MXBIX's 2.77% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXAPX
Great-West Aggressive Profile Fund
8.03%8.99%8.09%5.68%13.27%13.88%4.31%14.52%15.76%6.79%
MXBIX
Great-West Bond Index Fund
2.77%2.78%2.42%1.98%1.32%1.51%2.83%1.06%1.33%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXAPX and MXBIX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXAPX has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to MXBIX (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXAPX dropped -70.73% vs MXBIX's -19.74%.

MXAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXAPX and MXBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer