PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MXAPX vs. FSIRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MXAPX vs. FSIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Great-West Aggressive Profile Fund (MXAPX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MXAPX achieves a 12.42% return, which is significantly higher than FSIRX's 7.04% return. Over the past 10 years, MXAPX has outperformed FSIRX with an annualized return of 8.77%, while FSIRX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.47% annualized return.


MXAPX

1D
1.34%
1M
0.44%
6M
8.47%
YTD
12.42%
1Y
23.02%
3Y*
14.98%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
8.77%
ALL TIME*
1.92%

FSIRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.75%
6M
3.41%
YTD
7.04%
1Y
13.22%
3Y*
8.16%
5Y*
5.54%
10Y*
5.47%
ALL TIME*
4.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MXAPX vs. FSIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MXAPX
Great-West Aggressive Profile Fund
12.42%17.41%11.49%17.41%-16.14%19.63%11.52%25.35%-12.94%19.22%
FSIRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I
7.04%10.38%5.83%4.58%-3.34%15.89%3.72%10.55%-3.99%4.10%

Correlation

The correlation between MXAPX and FSIRX is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2005

0.54

The correlation between MXAPX and FSIRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MXAPX vs. FSIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MXAPX
MXAPX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MXAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
MXAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

FSIRX
FSIRX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FSIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FSIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MXAPX vs. FSIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Aggressive Profile Fund (MXAPX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MXAPXFSIRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.49

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

3.61

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.98

11.63

-5.65

MXAPX vs. FSIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MXAPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the FSIRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MXAPX and FSIRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MXAPX vs. FSIRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MXAPX drawdown since its inception was -70.73%, which is greater than FSIRX's maximum drawdown of -33.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXAPX and FSIRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MXAPXFSIRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.73%

-33.39%

-37.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.15%

-3.53%

-5.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.54%

-5.81%

-9.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.50%

-12.82%

-19.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.94%

-19.98%

-17.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-2.28%

+1.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.34%

-4.15%

-24.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

1.09%

+2.37%

Volatility

MXAPX vs. FSIRX - Volatility Comparison

Great-West Aggressive Profile Fund (MXAPX) has a higher volatility of 2.92% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX) at 1.75%. This indicates that MXAPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSIRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MXAPXFSIRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

1.75%

+1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.09%

3.98%

+6.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.11%

5.07%

+13.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.59%

6.93%

+11.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.59%

6.75%

+12.84%

MXAPX vs. FSIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MXAPX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FSIRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

MXAPX vs. FSIRX - Dividend Comparison

MXAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.00%, more than FSIRX's 3.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSIRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I
3.23%4.72%4.80%5.28%7.33%5.37%2.23%3.09%9.42%2.63%2.37%1.75%
MXAPX
Great-West Aggressive Profile Fund
8.00%8.99%8.09%5.68%13.27%13.88%4.31%14.52%15.76%6.79%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MXAPX and FSIRX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXAPX has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to FSIRX (1.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXAPX dropped -70.73% vs FSIRX's -33.39%.

FSIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MXAPX and FSIRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer