MWTRX vs. ICSH
MWTRX (Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund) and ICSH (iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF) are both funds - MWTRX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by Metropolitan West Funds, while ICSH is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. Over the past 10 years, MWTRX returned 1.36%/yr vs 2.77%/yr for ICSH. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MWTRX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for ICSH.
Performance
MWTRX vs. ICSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MWTRX achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly lower than ICSH's 1.55% return. Over the past 10 years, MWTRX has underperformed ICSH with an annualized return of 1.36%, while ICSH has yielded a comparatively higher 2.77% annualized return.
MWTRX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 0.57%
- 1Y
- 4.08%
- 3Y*
- 3.65%
- 5Y*
- -0.73%
- 10Y*
- 1.36%
ICSH
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- 4.15%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- 2.77%
MWTRX vs. ICSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MWTRX Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund | -0.08% | 7.29% | 0.45% | 5.77% | -15.52% | -1.51% | 8.79% | 8.95% | 0.17% | 3.10% |
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 1.55% | 4.96% | 5.52% | 5.58% | 0.97% | 0.16% | 1.61% | 3.17% | 2.25% | 1.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between MWTRX and ICSH is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2013 | 0.25 |
The correlation between MWTRX and ICSH shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MWTRX vs. ICSH — Risk / Return Rank
MWTRX
ICSH
MWTRX vs. ICSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund (MWTRX) and iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MWTRX | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -9.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -20.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 5.60 | -4.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 42.20 | -40.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.76 | 238.45 | -234.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MWTRX vs. ICSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MWTRX drawdown since its inception was -20.81%, which is greater than ICSH's maximum drawdown of -3.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWTRX and ICSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MWTRX | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.81% | -3.94% | -16.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.38% | -0.10% | -3.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.14% | -0.10% | -7.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.67% | -0.73% | -19.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.81% | -3.94% | -16.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.23% | -0.05% | -5.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.64% | -0.08% | -2.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.18% | 0.02% | +1.16% |
Volatility
MWTRX vs. ICSH - Volatility Comparison
Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund (MWTRX) has a higher volatility of 1.24% compared to iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH) at 0.16%. This indicates that MWTRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MWTRX | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.24% | 0.16% | +1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.24% | 0.32% | +2.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.32% | 0.41% | +3.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.65% | 0.49% | +6.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.32% | 1.06% | +4.26% |
MWTRX vs. ICSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
MWTRX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ICSH's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
MWTRX vs. ICSH - Dividend Comparison
MWTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than ICSH's 4.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 4.34% | 4.55% | 5.24% | 4.78% | 1.66% | 0.42% | 1.21% | 2.61% | 2.20% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 0.54% |
MWTRX Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund | 3.82% | 3.69% | 4.16% | 3.88% | 1.91% | 0.93% | 6.38% | 3.38% | 2.73% | 1.92% | 3.10% | 2.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MWTRX and ICSH have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MWTRX has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to ICSH (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MWTRX dropped -20.81% vs ICSH's -3.94%.
ICSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.20 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MWTRX and ICSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer