PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MWTRX vs. LSBDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MWTRX vs. LSBDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund (MWTRX) and Loomis Sayles Bond Fund (LSBDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MWTRX achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly higher than LSBDX's -0.19% return. Over the past 10 years, MWTRX has underperformed LSBDX with an annualized return of 1.42%, while LSBDX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.34% annualized return.


MWTRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.37%
YTD
0.14%
6M
-0.07%
1Y
5.36%
3Y*
3.72%
5Y*
-0.58%
10Y*
1.42%

LSBDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.18%
YTD
-0.19%
6M
0.13%
1Y
5.12%
3Y*
7.01%
5Y*
2.24%
10Y*
3.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MWTRX vs. LSBDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MWTRX
Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund
0.14%7.29%0.45%5.77%-15.52%-1.51%8.79%8.95%0.17%3.10%
LSBDX
Loomis Sayles Bond Fund
-0.19%8.67%6.70%8.05%-12.50%3.23%2.14%11.72%-2.87%7.47%

Correlation

The correlation between MWTRX and LSBDX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 1997

0.50

Over the past year, MWTRX and LSBDX have become more correlated (0.71) than their long-term average of 0.50, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MWTRX vs. LSBDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MWTRX
MWTRX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
MWTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MWTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
MWTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
MWTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
MWTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

LSBDX
LSBDX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
LSBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
LSBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MWTRX vs. LSBDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund (MWTRX) and Loomis Sayles Bond Fund (LSBDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MWTRXLSBDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.23

1.79

-0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.84

2.70

-0.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.34

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

1.90

-0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.91

6.36

-1.45

MWTRX vs. LSBDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MWTRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the LSBDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MWTRX and LSBDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MWTRXLSBDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

1.79

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

0.47

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.70

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

1.41

-0.42

Drawdowns

MWTRX vs. LSBDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MWTRX drawdown since its inception was -20.81%, smaller than the maximum LSBDX drawdown of -30.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWTRX and LSBDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MWTRXLSBDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.81%

-30.58%

+9.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.38%

-3.25%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.14%

-5.55%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.67%

-16.60%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.81%

-16.60%

-4.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.02%

-1.59%

-3.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.64%

-2.80%

+0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

0.98%

+0.12%

Volatility

MWTRX vs. LSBDX - Volatility Comparison

Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund (MWTRX) has a higher volatility of 1.62% compared to Loomis Sayles Bond Fund (LSBDX) at 1.28%. This indicates that MWTRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSBDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MWTRXLSBDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.62%

1.28%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.20%

2.58%

+0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.39%

3.44%

+0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.64%

5.01%

+1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.31%

4.88%

+0.43%

MWTRX vs. LSBDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MWTRX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than LSBDX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

MWTRX vs. LSBDX - Dividend Comparison

MWTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than LSBDX's 3.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSBDX
Loomis Sayles Bond Fund
3.87%4.15%5.51%5.09%5.13%2.88%3.83%3.97%3.78%5.86%3.13%7.37%
MWTRX
Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund
3.81%3.69%4.16%3.88%1.91%0.93%6.38%3.38%2.73%1.92%3.10%2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


MWTRX and LSBDX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MWTRX has higher volatility (1.62%) compared to LSBDX (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MWTRX dropped -20.81% vs LSBDX's -30.58%.

LSBDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MWTRX and LSBDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer