MWRL.L vs. LGGG.L
MWRL.L (Amundi Core MSCI World UCITS ETF Accumulating) and LGGG.L (L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - MWRL.L tracks the MSCI World while LGGG.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. MWRL.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for LGGG.L.
Performance
MWRL.L vs. LGGG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MWRL.L is traded in GBP, while LGGG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LGGG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
MWRL.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LGGG.L
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 3.09%
- YTD
- 9.36%
- 6M
- 9.19%
- 1Y
- 25.70%
- 3Y*
- 17.55%
- 5Y*
- 13.07%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MWRL.L vs. LGGG.L — Risk / Return Rank
MWRL.L
LGGG.L
MWRL.L vs. LGGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Core MSCI World UCITS ETF Accumulating (MWRL.L) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MWRL.L | LGGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.47 | — |
Drawdowns
MWRL.L vs. LGGG.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MWRL.L | LGGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -30.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.84% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -7.23% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.68% | — |
Volatility
MWRL.L vs. LGGG.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MWRL.L | LGGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.36% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 10.19% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 19.08% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 20.41% | — |
MWRL.L vs. LGGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MWRL.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than LGGG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MWRL.L vs. LGGG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MWRL.L nor LGGG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, LGGG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGGG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for MWRL.L.
MWRL.L tracks MSCI World, while LGGG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for MWRL.L and 0.10% for LGGG.L.
Find the right allocation for MWRL.L and LGGG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer