MWRL.L vs. JPLG.L
MWRL.L (Amundi Core MSCI World UCITS ETF Accumulating) and JPLG.L (JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both Global Equities funds - MWRL.L tracks the MSCI World while JPLG.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. MWRL.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for JPLG.L.
Performance
MWRL.L vs. JPLG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MWRL.L is traded in GBP, while JPLG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JPLG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
MWRL.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JPLG.L
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 3.15%
- YTD
- 10.58%
- 6M
- 10.74%
- 1Y
- 22.30%
- 3Y*
- 13.62%
- 5Y*
- 10.37%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MWRL.L vs. JPLG.L — Risk / Return Rank
MWRL.L
JPLG.L
MWRL.L vs. JPLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Core MSCI World UCITS ETF Accumulating (MWRL.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MWRL.L | JPLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.69 | — |
Drawdowns
MWRL.L vs. JPLG.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MWRL.L | JPLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -27.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.17% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -3.29% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.50% | — |
Volatility
MWRL.L vs. JPLG.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MWRL.L | JPLG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.89% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.85% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 7.84% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 10.89% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 13.74% | — |
MWRL.L vs. JPLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MWRL.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than JPLG.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MWRL.L vs. JPLG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MWRL.L nor JPLG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, MWRL.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MWRL.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for JPLG.L.
MWRL.L tracks MSCI World, while JPLG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for MWRL.L and 0.20% for JPLG.L.
Find the right allocation for MWRL.L and JPLG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer