PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MWRL.L vs. JPLG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MWRL.L vs. JPLG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Core MSCI World UCITS ETF Accumulating (MWRL.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MWRL.L is traded in GBP, while JPLG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JPLG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


MWRL.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JPLG.L

1D
-0.17%
1M
3.15%
YTD
10.58%
6M
10.74%
1Y
22.30%
3Y*
13.62%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MWRL.L vs. JPLG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MWRL.L

JPLG.L
JPLG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
JPLG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPLG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MWRL.L vs. JPLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Core MSCI World UCITS ETF Accumulating (MWRL.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MWRL.L vs. JPLG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MWRL.LJPLG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

Drawdowns

MWRL.L vs. JPLG.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MWRL.LJPLG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

Volatility

MWRL.L vs. JPLG.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MWRL.LJPLG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.74%

MWRL.L vs. JPLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MWRL.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than JPLG.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MWRL.L vs. JPLG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MWRL.L nor JPLG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, MWRL.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MWRL.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for JPLG.L.

MWRL.L tracks MSCI World, while JPLG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for MWRL.L and 0.20% for JPLG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MWRL.L and JPLG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer