MWOFX vs. MIGFX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Global Growth Fund (MWOFX) and MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX).
MWOFX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Nov 17, 1993. MIGFX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Jan 1, 1935.
Performance
MWOFX vs. MIGFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MWOFX vs. MIGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MWOFX MFS Global Growth Fund | -9.21% | 7.17% | 10.68% | 20.63% | -19.28% | 18.33% | 20.23% | 35.37% | -4.94% | 31.13% |
MIGFX MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund | -9.36% | 9.97% | 27.25% | 24.13% | -19.20% | 26.06% | 22.55% | 39.89% | 0.81% | 28.68% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MWOFX having a -9.21% return and MIGFX slightly lower at -9.36%. Over the past 10 years, MWOFX has underperformed MIGFX with an annualized return of 9.82%, while MIGFX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.69% annualized return.
MWOFX
- 1D
- 2.82%
- 1M
- -6.61%
- YTD
- -9.21%
- 6M
- -8.62%
- 1Y
- 0.58%
- 3Y*
- 6.17%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- 9.82%
MIGFX
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -5.97%
- YTD
- -9.36%
- 6M
- -8.66%
- 1Y
- 4.69%
- 3Y*
- 13.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.85%
- 10Y*
- 13.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MWOFX vs. MIGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MWOFX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than MIGFX's 0.70% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MWOFX vs. MIGFX — Risk / Return Rank
MWOFX
MIGFX
MWOFX vs. MIGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Global Growth Fund (MWOFX) and MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MWOFX | MIGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.05 | 0.28 | -0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.19 | 0.54 | -0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.07 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.07 | 0.40 | -0.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.27 | 1.43 | -1.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MWOFX | MIGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 | 0.28 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.51 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.76 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.38 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between MWOFX and MIGFX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MWOFX vs. MIGFX - Dividend Comparison
MWOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.97%, less than MIGFX's 12.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MWOFX MFS Global Growth Fund | 5.97% | 5.42% | 5.14% | 2.09% | 3.60% | 6.25% | 3.13% | 1.86% | 5.00% | 3.43% | 1.68% | 6.08% |
MIGFX MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund | 12.57% | 11.39% | 17.15% | 4.11% | 4.49% | 10.47% | 7.43% | 7.39% | 10.76% | 6.87% | 5.12% | 6.51% |
Drawdowns
MWOFX vs. MIGFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MWOFX drawdown since its inception was -56.10%, smaller than the maximum MIGFX drawdown of -61.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWOFX and MIGFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MWOFX | MIGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.10% | -61.83% | +5.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.82% | -13.77% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.64% | -26.67% | -0.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.68% | -32.42% | +0.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.39% | -11.24% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.94% | -19.00% | +7.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 3.83% | -0.06% |
Volatility
MWOFX vs. MIGFX - Volatility Comparison
MFS Global Growth Fund (MWOFX) and MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX) have volatilities of 5.35% and 5.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MWOFX | MIGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 5.49% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.17% | 9.81% | -0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.04% | 17.85% | -1.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.74% | 17.50% | -1.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 18.18% | -1.60% |