MIGFX vs. FNIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX) and Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class A (FNIAX).
MIGFX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Jan 1, 1935. FNIAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 31, 2003.
Performance
MIGFX vs. FNIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MIGFX vs. FNIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIGFX MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund | -11.94% | 9.97% | 27.25% | 24.13% | -19.20% | 26.06% | 22.55% | 39.89% | 0.81% | 28.68% |
FNIAX Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class A | -7.49% | 21.17% | 34.94% | 35.97% | -26.57% | 24.40% | 23.62% | 29.17% | -4.67% | 28.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MIGFX achieves a -11.94% return, which is significantly lower than FNIAX's -7.49% return. Over the past 10 years, MIGFX has underperformed FNIAX with an annualized return of 13.37%, while FNIAX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.58% annualized return.
MIGFX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -9.05%
- YTD
- -11.94%
- 6M
- -10.77%
- 1Y
- 2.07%
- 3Y*
- 12.38%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.37%
FNIAX
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -9.26%
- YTD
- -7.49%
- 6M
- -4.20%
- 1Y
- 20.18%
- 3Y*
- 23.16%
- 5Y*
- 12.88%
- 10Y*
- 14.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MIGFX vs. FNIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MIGFX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than FNIAX's 0.93% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MIGFX vs. FNIAX — Risk / Return Rank
MIGFX
FNIAX
MIGFX vs. FNIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX) and Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class A (FNIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MIGFX | FNIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.14 | 1.04 | -0.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.33 | 1.56 | -1.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.23 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.04 | 1.59 | -1.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.14 | 6.45 | -6.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MIGFX | FNIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 | 1.04 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.68 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.76 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.60 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between MIGFX and FNIAX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MIGFX vs. FNIAX - Dividend Comparison
MIGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.93%, more than FNIAX's 10.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MIGFX MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund | 12.93% | 11.39% | 17.15% | 4.11% | 4.49% | 10.47% | 7.43% | 7.39% | 10.76% | 6.87% | 5.12% | 6.51% |
FNIAX Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class A | 10.10% | 8.96% | 5.85% | 6.18% | 17.12% | 12.66% | 8.14% | 6.48% | 13.78% | 7.61% | 4.99% | 4.40% |
Drawdowns
MIGFX vs. FNIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MIGFX drawdown since its inception was -61.83%, which is greater than FNIAX's maximum drawdown of -49.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIGFX and FNIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MIGFX | FNIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.83% | -49.69% | -12.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.77% | -10.85% | -2.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.67% | -31.98% | +5.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.42% | -31.98% | -0.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.77% | -10.41% | -3.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.00% | -7.28% | -11.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 2.68% | +1.09% |
Volatility
MIGFX vs. FNIAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX) is 4.36%, while Fidelity Advisor New Insights Fund Class A (FNIAX) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that MIGFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MIGFX | FNIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | 5.30% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.37% | 10.84% | -1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.64% | 19.55% | -1.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 19.01% | -1.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.16% | 19.22% | -1.06% |