PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIGFX vs. ALBAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIGFX vs. ALBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX) and Alger Growth & Income Fund (ALBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIGFX achieves a -3.03% return, which is significantly lower than ALBAX's 13.01% return. Over the past 10 years, MIGFX has underperformed ALBAX with an annualized return of 14.42%, while ALBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.46% annualized return.


MIGFX

1D
0.95%
1M
-0.69%
YTD
-3.03%
6M
-3.24%
1Y
7.48%
3Y*
13.39%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
14.42%

ALBAX

1D
1.19%
1M
0.96%
YTD
13.01%
6M
12.68%
1Y
33.41%
3Y*
21.55%
5Y*
15.10%
10Y*
15.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MIGFX vs. ALBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIGFX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund
-3.03%9.97%27.25%24.13%-19.20%26.06%22.55%39.89%0.81%28.68%
ALBAX
Alger Growth & Income Fund
13.01%19.89%21.81%22.60%-14.12%30.79%15.22%28.92%-4.72%20.18%

Correlation

The correlation between MIGFX and ALBAX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1997

0.93

The correlation between MIGFX and ALBAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIGFX vs. ALBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MIGFX
MIGFX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
MIGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
MIGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

ALBAX
ALBAX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ALBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ALBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MIGFX vs. ALBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX) and Alger Growth & Income Fund (ALBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MIGFXALBAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.47

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.51

4.21

-3.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.66

18.61

-16.95

MIGFX vs. ALBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIGFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the ALBAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIGFX and ALBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MIGFX vs. ALBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIGFX drawdown since its inception was -61.83%, which is greater than ALBAX's maximum drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIGFX and ALBAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIGFXALBAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.83%

-40.56%

-21.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.77%

-7.86%

-5.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.68%

-17.65%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.67%

-22.06%

-4.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.42%

-34.26%

+1.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.04%

-0.74%

-4.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.94%

-7.33%

-11.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.25%

1.77%

+2.48%

Volatility

MIGFX vs. ALBAX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to Alger Growth & Income Fund (ALBAX) at 4.39%. This indicates that MIGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIGFXALBAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

4.39%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.65%

9.79%

+0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.13%

12.56%

+0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.61%

15.59%

+2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.25%

17.28%

+0.97%

MIGFX vs. ALBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIGFX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than ALBAX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIGFX vs. ALBAX - Dividend Comparison

MIGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.75%, more than ALBAX's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALBAX
Alger Growth & Income Fund
0.72%0.74%1.08%0.98%1.24%4.17%2.55%5.00%6.75%2.35%1.56%3.75%
MIGFX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund
11.75%11.39%17.15%4.11%4.49%10.47%7.43%7.39%10.76%6.87%5.12%6.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


MIGFX and ALBAX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MIGFX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to ALBAX (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIGFX dropped -61.83% vs ALBAX's -40.56%.

ALBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIGFX and ALBAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer