PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIGFX vs. ALBAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MIGFX vs. ALBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX) and Alger Growth & Income Fund (ALBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MIGFX achieves a -1.78% return, which is significantly lower than ALBAX's 12.10% return. Over the past 10 years, MIGFX has underperformed ALBAX with an annualized return of 14.08%, while ALBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.90% annualized return.


MIGFX

1D
1.34%
1M
0.92%
6M
-1.02%
YTD
-1.78%
1Y
3.68%
3Y*
12.93%
5Y*
8.13%
10Y*
14.08%
ALL TIME*
7.42%

ALBAX

1D
1.44%
1M
-0.39%
6M
9.72%
YTD
12.10%
1Y
26.12%
3Y*
19.66%
5Y*
13.53%
10Y*
14.90%
ALL TIME*
10.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MIGFX vs. ALBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MIGFX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund
-1.78%9.97%27.25%24.13%-19.20%26.06%22.55%39.89%0.81%28.68%
ALBAX
Alger Growth & Income Fund
12.10%19.89%21.81%22.60%-14.12%30.79%15.22%28.92%-4.72%20.18%

Correlation

The correlation between MIGFX and ALBAX is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1997

0.93

The correlation between MIGFX and ALBAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MIGFX vs. ALBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MIGFX
MIGFX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
MIGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
MIGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

ALBAX
ALBAX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ALBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ALBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MIGFX vs. ALBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX) and Alger Growth & Income Fund (ALBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MIGFXALBAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.32

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.12

3.04

-2.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.36

12.95

-12.59

MIGFX vs. ALBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MIGFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the ALBAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MIGFX and ALBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MIGFX vs. ALBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MIGFX drawdown since its inception was -61.83%, which is greater than ALBAX's maximum drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MIGFX and ALBAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MIGFXALBAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.83%

-40.56%

-21.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.77%

-7.86%

-5.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.68%

-17.65%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.67%

-22.06%

-4.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.42%

-34.26%

+1.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.82%

-1.66%

-2.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.91%

-7.31%

-11.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.57%

1.84%

+2.73%

Volatility

MIGFX vs. ALBAX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund (MIGFX) and Alger Growth & Income Fund (ALBAX) have volatilities of 3.24% and 3.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MIGFXALBAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.24%

3.23%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.75%

9.92%

+0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.39%

12.97%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.63%

15.61%

+2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.20%

17.25%

+0.95%

MIGFX vs. ALBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MIGFX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than ALBAX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

MIGFX vs. ALBAX - Dividend Comparison

MIGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.79%, more than ALBAX's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALBAX
Alger Growth & Income Fund
0.72%0.74%1.08%0.98%1.24%4.17%2.55%5.00%6.75%2.35%1.56%3.75%
MIGFX
MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund
10.79%11.39%17.15%4.11%4.49%10.47%7.43%7.39%10.76%6.87%5.12%6.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


MIGFX and ALBAX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MIGFX has higher volatility (3.24%) compared to ALBAX (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MIGFX dropped -61.83% vs ALBAX's -40.56%.

ALBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MIGFX and ALBAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer