MVPL vs. ENFR

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MVPL (Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MVPL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Miller, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. MVPL is actively managed, while ENFR is passively managed. Over the past year, MVPL returned 44.75% vs 24.84% for ENFR. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MVPL charges 1.72%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.

Performance

MVPL vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF (MVPL) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVPL achieves a 16.19% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 23.07% return.

MVPL

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: -0.55%
• YTD: 16.19%
• 6M: 15.20%
• 1Y: 44.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ENFR

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: -5.94%
• YTD: 23.07%
• 6M: 24.76%
• 1Y: 24.84%
• 3Y*: 28.26%
• 5Y*: 19.69%
• 10Y*: 11.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVPL vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MVPL Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF	16.19%	25.67%	24.41%
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	23.07%	5.88%	36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between MVPL and ENFR is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2024	0.22

The correlation between MVPL and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MVPL vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVPL

MVPL Risk / Return Rank: 62
MVPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
MVPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
MVPL Omega Ratio Rank: 57
MVPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
MVPL Martin Ratio Rank: 65

ENFR

ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 50
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 46
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVPL vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF (MVPL) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MVPL	ENFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	1.69	+0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	2.35	+0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.29	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.55	2.89	+0.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.46	7.40	+4.06

MVPL vs. ENFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVPL Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the ENFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVPL and ENFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MVPL vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVPL drawdown since its inception was -25.68%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVPL and ENFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	MVPL	ENFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.68%	-68.28%	+42.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.68%	-8.64%	-4.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.58%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.29%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-62.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.97%	-6.12%	+2.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.26%	-15.94%	+11.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.92%	3.36%	+0.56%

Volatility

MVPL vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison

Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF (MVPL) has a higher volatility of 8.93% compared to Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) at 5.42%. This indicates that MVPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MVPL	ENFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.93%	5.42%	+3.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.86%	11.57%	+5.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.44%	14.82%	+7.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.37%	19.24%	+6.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.37%	24.68%	+0.69%

MVPL vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVPL has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

MVPL vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

MVPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than ENFR's 4.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	4.08%	4.77%	4.41%	5.48%	5.23%	7.86%	7.57%	5.81%	3.98%	2.98%	3.31%	3.34%
MVPL Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF	0.94%	1.10%	7.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MVPL and ENFR in my portfolio?

MVPL and ENFR have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MVPL or ENFR?

MVPL has higher volatility (8.93%) compared to ENFR (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVPL dropped -25.68% vs ENFR's -68.28%.

Which ETF is better, MVPL or ENFR?

On 1-year performance, MVPL leads with 44.75% vs 24.84% for ENFR. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ENFR has been the lower-risk option at 5.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MVPL or ENFR?

Over the 1-year period, MVPL has performed better with a 44.75% return vs 24.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MVPL or ENFR?

ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.72% for MVPL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MVPL or ENFR?

ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.08%, compared with 0.94% for MVPL.

What is the main difference between MVPL and ENFR?

MVPL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ENFR is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Miller and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 1.72% for MVPL and 0.35% for ENFR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MVPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.