MVPA vs. POW

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

MVPA (Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MVPA is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Miller, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MVPA charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

MVPA vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF (MVPA) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVPA achieves a 4.59% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 41.57% return.

MVPA

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 5.28%
• 6M: -0.39%
• YTD: 4.59%
• 1Y: 0.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

POW

• 1D: 1.90%
• 1M: -7.03%
• 6M: 34.18%
• YTD: 41.57%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVPA vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MVPA Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF	4.59%	-4.58%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	41.57%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between MVPA and POW is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.26

Return for Risk

MVPA vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVPA

MVPA Risk / Return Rank: 10
MVPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
MVPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
MVPA Omega Ratio Rank: 10
MVPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
MVPA Martin Ratio Rank: 10

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVPA vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF (MVPA) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MVPA	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.04	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.19	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.06	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.11	—	—

Drawdowns

MVPA vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVPA drawdown since its inception was -25.91%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVPA and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	MVPA	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.91%	-18.37%	-7.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.87%	-16.82%	+10.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.39%	-4.40%	-2.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.34%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MVPA	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.81%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.96%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.82%	32.91%	-14.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.83%	32.91%	-10.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.83%	32.91%	-10.08%

MVPA vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVPA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MVPA vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

MVPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
MVPA Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF	0.53%	0.56%	0.94%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MVPA and POW in my portfolio?

MVPA and POW have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MVPA or POW?

On fees, MVPA is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MVPA or POW?

MVPA is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MVPA or POW?

MVPA has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between MVPA and POW?

MVPA is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Miller and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for MVPA and 0.75% for POW.