MVIS vs. SLV
MVIS (MicroVision, Inc.) is a stock, while SLV (iShares Silver Trust) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Over the past 10 years, MVIS returned -15.00%/yr vs 10.58%/yr for SLV. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MVIS vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVIS achieves a -54.46% return, which is significantly lower than SLV's -19.03% return. Over the past 10 years, MVIS has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of -15.00%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 10.58% annualized return.
MVIS
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- 6M
- -61.36%
- YTD
- -54.46%
- 1Y
- -67.49%
- 3Y*
- -55.04%
- 5Y*
- -51.36%
- 10Y*
- -15.00%
SLV
- 1D
- -3.32%
- 1M
- -14.90%
- 6M
- -32.46%
- YTD
- -19.03%
- 1Y
- 48.90%
- 3Y*
- 31.65%
- 5Y*
- 16.48%
- 10Y*
- 10.58%
MVIS vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVIS MicroVision, Inc. | -54.46% | -36.79% | -50.75% | 13.19% | -53.09% | -6.88% | 647.22% | 19.23% | -62.95% | 29.37% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | -19.03% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between MVIS and SLV is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2006 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MVIS vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
MVIS
SLV
MVIS vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MVIS | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.20 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 0.96 | -1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | 1.99 | -3.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MVIS vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVIS drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, which is greater than SLV's maximum drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVIS and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MVIS | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.97% | -76.28% | -23.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -81.34% | -50.97% | -30.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -93.35% | -50.97% | -42.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.24% | -50.97% | -47.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.94% | -50.97% | -47.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.93% | -50.61% | -49.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.53% | -44.67% | -41.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.25% | 24.60% | +21.65% |
Volatility
MVIS vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS) has a higher volatility of 34.65% compared to iShares Silver Trust (SLV) at 14.50%. This indicates that MVIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MVIS | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.65% | 14.50% | +20.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 82.91% | 57.45% | +25.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 91.21% | 61.10% | +30.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.00% | 36.85% | +53.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 115.45% | 32.17% | +83.28% |
Dividends
MVIS vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
Neither MVIS nor SLV has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MVIS and SLV have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MVIS has higher volatility (34.65%) compared to SLV (14.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVIS dropped -99.97% vs SLV's -76.28%.
SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MVIS and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer