PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVIS vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MVIS vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVIS achieves a -58.37% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 8.46% return. Over the past 10 years, MVIS has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of -15.14%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 30.05% annualized return.


MVIS

1D
-4.17%
1M
-44.68%
YTD
-58.37%
6M
-63.00%
1Y
-69.50%
3Y*
-56.19%
5Y*
-54.41%
10Y*
-15.14%

AAPL

1D
-0.91%
1M
-4.70%
YTD
8.46%
6M
8.26%
1Y
46.63%
3Y*
16.93%
5Y*
17.74%
10Y*
30.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVIS vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MVIS
MicroVision, Inc.
-58.37%-36.79%-50.75%13.19%-53.09%-6.88%647.22%19.23%-62.95%29.37%
AAPL
Apple Inc
8.46%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%

Correlation

The correlation between MVIS and AAPL is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 1996

0.22

The correlation between MVIS and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (3 years) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MVIS:

$106.39M

AAPL:

$4.35T

EPS

MVIS:

-$0.31

AAPL:

$8.24

PS Ratio

MVIS:

64.56

AAPL:

9.70

PB Ratio

MVIS:

2.69

AAPL:

40.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

MVIS:

$1.55M

AAPL:

$451.44B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MVIS:

-$17.02M

AAPL:

$216.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

MVIS:

-$74.42M

AAPL:

$153.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MVIS vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVIS
MVIS Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
MVIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVIS Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
MVIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVIS Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVIS vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MVISAAPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.38

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.90

3.40

-4.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.62

8.35

-9.97

MVIS vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVIS Sharpe Ratio is -0.82, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVIS and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MVIS vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVIS drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, which is greater than AAPL's maximum drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVIS and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MVISAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.97%

-81.80%

-18.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-77.02%

-13.80%

-63.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-92.47%

-33.36%

-59.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.13%

-33.36%

-64.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.70%

-38.52%

-60.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.93%

-6.63%

-93.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.50%

-29.58%

-56.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.88%

5.60%

+37.28%

Volatility

MVIS vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS) has a higher volatility of 41.47% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 6.98%. This indicates that MVIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MVISAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

41.47%

6.98%

+34.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

77.03%

16.62%

+60.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

84.85%

22.57%

+62.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

88.84%

27.52%

+61.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

114.99%

28.92%

+86.07%

Dividends

MVIS vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

MVIS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.36%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
MVIS
MicroVision, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MVIS vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MicroVision, Inc. and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B20222023202420252026
935.00K
111.18B
(MVIS) Total Revenue
(AAPL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MVIS and AAPL have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MVIS has higher volatility (41.47%) compared to AAPL (6.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVIS dropped -99.97% vs AAPL's -81.80%.

AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVIS and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer