PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVIS vs. TSLA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MVIS vs. TSLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVIS achieves a -48.45% return, which is significantly lower than TSLA's -5.79% return. Over the past 10 years, MVIS has underperformed TSLA with an annualized return of -13.59%, while TSLA has yielded a comparatively higher 40.05% annualized return.


MVIS

1D
3.89%
1M
-35.90%
YTD
-48.45%
6M
-51.60%
1Y
-62.88%
3Y*
-55.70%
5Y*
-53.79%
10Y*
-13.59%

TSLA

1D
-0.01%
1M
7.95%
YTD
-5.79%
6M
-5.16%
1Y
23.07%
3Y*
25.57%
5Y*
16.24%
10Y*
40.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVIS vs. TSLA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MVIS
MicroVision, Inc.
-48.45%-36.79%-50.75%13.19%-53.09%-6.88%647.22%19.23%-62.95%29.37%
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
-5.79%11.36%62.52%101.72%-65.03%49.76%743.44%25.70%6.89%45.70%

Correlation

The correlation between MVIS and TSLA is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2010

0.23

The correlation between MVIS and TSLA shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MVIS:

$131.76M

TSLA:

$1.50T

EPS

MVIS:

-$0.31

TSLA:

$1.10

PS Ratio

MVIS:

79.96

TSLA:

15.28

PB Ratio

MVIS:

3.33

TSLA:

17.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

MVIS:

$1.55M

TSLA:

$97.88B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MVIS:

-$17.02M

TSLA:

$18.66B

EBITDA (TTM)

MVIS:

-$74.42M

TSLA:

$10.48B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MVIS vs. TSLA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVIS
MVIS Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
MVIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
MVIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVIS Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLA
TSLA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
TSLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLA Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLA Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVIS vs. TSLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MVISTSLADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.73

0.50

-1.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.87

0.97

-1.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.12

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.87

0.77

-1.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.60

1.81

-3.41

MVIS vs. TSLA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVIS Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the TSLA Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVIS and TSLA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MVISTSLADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.73

0.50

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.61

0.28

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.12

0.68

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.14

0.73

-0.88

Drawdowns

MVIS vs. TSLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVIS drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, which is greater than TSLA's maximum drawdown of -73.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVIS and TSLA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MVISTSLADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.97%

-73.63%

-26.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.61%

-29.93%

-42.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-94.63%

-53.77%

-40.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.18%

-73.63%

-24.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.45%

-73.63%

-24.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.92%

-13.51%

-86.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.48%

-22.73%

-63.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.43%

12.84%

+26.59%

Volatility

MVIS vs. TSLA - Volatility Comparison

MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS) has a higher volatility of 50.14% compared to Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) at 12.12%. This indicates that MVIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MVISTSLADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

50.14%

12.12%

+38.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

77.23%

27.28%

+49.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

86.73%

46.36%

+40.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

89.20%

58.85%

+30.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

114.88%

59.11%

+55.77%

Dividends

MVIS vs. TSLA - Dividend Comparison

Neither MVIS nor TSLA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

MVIS vs. TSLA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MicroVision, Inc. and Tesla, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B20222023202420252026
935.00K
22.39B
(MVIS) Total Revenue
(TSLA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MVIS and TSLA have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MVIS has higher volatility (50.14%) compared to TSLA (12.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVIS dropped -99.97% vs TSLA's -73.63%.

TSLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVIS and TSLA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer