MVFD vs. DABS

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

MVFD (Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree ETF) and DABS (DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MVFD is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree Index, while DABS is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by DoubleLine. MVFD is passively managed, while DABS is actively managed. Over the past year, MVFD returned 17.53% vs 5.07% for DABS. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. MVFD charges 1.19%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for DABS.

Performance

MVFD vs. DABS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree ETF (MVFD) and DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVFD achieves a 6.33% return, which is significantly higher than DABS's 1.43% return.

MVFD

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: -2.88%
• YTD: 6.33%
• 6M: 4.00%
• 1Y: 17.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DABS

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 0.67%
• YTD: 1.43%
• 6M: 1.55%
• 1Y: 5.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVFD vs. DABS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MVFD Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree ETF	6.33%	7.16%
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF	1.43%	5.63%

Correlation

The correlation between MVFD and DABS is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2025	-0.07

Return for Risk

MVFD vs. DABS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVFD

MVFD Risk / Return Rank: 38
MVFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
MVFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
MVFD Omega Ratio Rank: 34
MVFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
MVFD Martin Ratio Rank: 40

DABS

DABS Risk / Return Rank: 80
DABS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
DABS Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
DABS Omega Ratio Rank: 81
DABS Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
DABS Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVFD vs. DABS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree ETF (MVFD) and DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MVFD	DABS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	2.07	-0.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	3.20	-1.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.42	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	3.95	-2.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.61	13.47	-7.86

MVFD vs. DABS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVFD Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the DABS Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVFD and DABS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MVFD vs. DABS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVFD drawdown since its inception was -19.07%, which is greater than DABS's maximum drawdown of -1.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVFD and DABS.

Drawdown Indicators

	MVFD	DABS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.07%	-1.47%	-17.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.08%	-1.29%	-7.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.72%	0.00%	-4.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.92%	-0.30%	-3.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.13%	0.38%	+2.75%

Volatility

MVFD vs. DABS - Volatility Comparison

Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree ETF (MVFD) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) at 0.74%. This indicates that MVFD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DABS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MVFD	DABS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.14%	0.74%	+3.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.39%	1.68%	+8.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.30%	2.47%	+12.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.99%	2.56%	+14.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.99%	2.56%	+14.43%

MVFD vs. DABS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVFD has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than DABS's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

MVFD vs. DABS - Dividend Comparison

MVFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than DABS's 4.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF	4.86%	3.81%	0.00%
MVFD Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree ETF	1.48%	1.34%	1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MVFD and DABS in my portfolio?

MVFD and DABS have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MVFD or DABS?

MVFD has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to DABS (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVFD dropped -19.07% vs DABS's -1.47%.

Which ETF is better, MVFD or DABS?

On 1-year performance, MVFD leads with 17.53% vs 5.07% for DABS. On fees, DABS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, DABS has been the lower-risk option at 0.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MVFD or DABS?

Over the 1-year period, MVFD has performed better with a 17.53% return vs 5.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MVFD or DABS?

DABS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.19% for MVFD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MVFD or DABS?

DABS has the higher dividend yield at 4.86%, compared with 1.48% for MVFD.

What is the main difference between MVFD and DABS?

MVFD is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DABS is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Monarch and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 1.19% for MVFD and 0.40% for DABS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DABS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.