PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVFD vs. MPRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MVFD vs. MPRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree ETF (MVFD) and Monarch ProCap ETF (MPRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVFD achieves a 7.08% return, which is significantly higher than MPRO's 6.22% return.


MVFD

1D
0.58%
1M
-2.19%
YTD
7.08%
6M
4.31%
1Y
19.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MPRO

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.09%
YTD
6.22%
6M
6.18%
1Y
13.01%
3Y*
9.90%
5Y*
5.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVFD vs. MPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MVFD
Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree ETF
7.08%10.09%5.47%
MPRO
Monarch ProCap ETF
6.22%9.33%5.93%

Correlation

The correlation between MVFD and MPRO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.61

The correlation between MVFD and MPRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MVFD vs. MPRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVFD
MVFD Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
MVFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVFD Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
MVFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVFD Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

MPRO
MPRO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
MPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVFD vs. MPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree ETF (MVFD) and Monarch ProCap ETF (MPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MVFDMPRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.34

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

2.30

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.43

9.07

-2.64

MVFD vs. MPRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVFD Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the MPRO Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVFD and MPRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MVFD vs. MPRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVFD drawdown since its inception was -19.07%, which is greater than MPRO's maximum drawdown of -14.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVFD and MPRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MVFDMPRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.07%

-14.51%

-4.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.08%

-5.67%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.05%

-0.98%

-3.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.92%

-3.43%

-0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

1.44%

+1.67%

Volatility

MVFD vs. MPRO - Volatility Comparison

Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree ETF (MVFD) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to Monarch ProCap ETF (MPRO) at 2.04%. This indicates that MVFD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MVFDMPRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.18%

2.04%

+2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.41%

5.15%

+5.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.33%

6.81%

+8.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.02%

9.28%

+7.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.02%

9.22%

+7.80%

MVFD vs. MPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVFD has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than MPRO's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

MVFD vs. MPRO - Dividend Comparison

MVFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than MPRO's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MPRO
Monarch ProCap ETF
1.87%1.93%1.64%1.40%1.09%0.95%
MVFD
Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree ETF
1.47%1.34%1.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MVFD and MPRO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MVFD has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to MPRO (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVFD dropped -19.07% vs MPRO's -14.51%.

On 1-year performance, MVFD leads with 19.92% vs 13.01% for MPRO. On fees, MPRO is cheaper at 1.17% per year. On volatility, MPRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MVFD has performed better with a 19.92% return vs 13.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MPRO is cheaper with a 1.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.19% for MVFD.

MPRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.47% for MVFD.

MVFD tracks Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree Index, while MPRO tracks Monarch ProCap Index. Their fees differ too: 1.19% for MVFD and 1.17% for MPRO.

MPRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVFD and MPRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer