MVFD vs. MPRO
MVFD (Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree ETF) and MPRO (Monarch ProCap ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from Monarch - MVFD tracks the Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree Index while MPRO tracks the Monarch ProCap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MVFD returned 19.92% vs 13.01% for MPRO. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MVFD charges 1.19%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for MPRO.
Performance
MVFD vs. MPRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVFD achieves a 7.08% return, which is significantly higher than MPRO's 6.22% return.
MVFD
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -2.19%
- YTD
- 7.08%
- 6M
- 4.31%
- 1Y
- 19.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MPRO
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 6.22%
- 6M
- 6.18%
- 1Y
- 13.01%
- 3Y*
- 9.90%
- 5Y*
- 5.68%
- 10Y*
- —
MVFD vs. MPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MVFD Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree ETF | 7.08% | 10.09% | 5.47% |
MPRO Monarch ProCap ETF | 6.22% | 9.33% | 5.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between MVFD and MPRO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024 | 0.61 |
The correlation between MVFD and MPRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MVFD vs. MPRO — Risk / Return Rank
MVFD
MPRO
MVFD vs. MPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree ETF (MVFD) and Monarch ProCap ETF (MPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MVFD | MPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.34 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 2.30 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.43 | 9.07 | -2.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MVFD vs. MPRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVFD drawdown since its inception was -19.07%, which is greater than MPRO's maximum drawdown of -14.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVFD and MPRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MVFD | MPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.07% | -14.51% | -4.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.08% | -5.67% | -3.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.05% | -0.98% | -3.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.92% | -3.43% | -0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 1.44% | +1.67% |
Volatility
MVFD vs. MPRO - Volatility Comparison
Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree ETF (MVFD) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to Monarch ProCap ETF (MPRO) at 2.04%. This indicates that MVFD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MVFD | MPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.18% | 2.04% | +2.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.41% | 5.15% | +5.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.33% | 6.81% | +8.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.02% | 9.28% | +7.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.02% | 9.22% | +7.80% |
MVFD vs. MPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MVFD has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than MPRO's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
MVFD vs. MPRO - Dividend Comparison
MVFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than MPRO's 1.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPRO Monarch ProCap ETF | 1.87% | 1.93% | 1.64% | 1.40% | 1.09% | 0.95% |
MVFD Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree ETF | 1.47% | 1.34% | 1.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MVFD and MPRO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MVFD has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to MPRO (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVFD dropped -19.07% vs MPRO's -14.51%.
On 1-year performance, MVFD leads with 19.92% vs 13.01% for MPRO. On fees, MPRO is cheaper at 1.17% per year. On volatility, MPRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MVFD has performed better with a 19.92% return vs 13.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MPRO is cheaper with a 1.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.19% for MVFD.
MPRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.47% for MVFD.
MVFD tracks Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree Index, while MPRO tracks Monarch ProCap Index. Their fees differ too: 1.19% for MVFD and 1.17% for MPRO.
MPRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MVFD and MPRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer