MVALX vs. QCGDX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MVALX (Meridian Contrarian Fund) and QCGDX (Quantified Common Ground Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MVALX returned 8.16%/yr vs 9.03%/yr for QCGDX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MVALX charges 1.12%/yr vs 1.68%/yr for QCGDX.

Performance

MVALX vs. QCGDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meridian Contrarian Fund (MVALX) and Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MVALX having a 17.57% return and QCGDX slightly higher at 18.04%.

MVALX

• 1D: 1.96%
• 1M: 6.59%
• YTD: 17.57%
• 6M: 18.16%
• 1Y: 35.80%
• 3Y*: 16.74%
• 5Y*: 8.16%
• 10Y*: 13.55%

QCGDX

• 1D: 1.49%
• 1M: 2.01%
• YTD: 18.04%
• 6M: 18.70%
• 1Y: 23.46%
• 3Y*: 13.65%
• 5Y*: 9.03%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVALX vs. QCGDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
MVALX Meridian Contrarian Fund	17.57%	17.43%	9.73%	12.40%	-16.67%	26.66%	23.75%	0.23%
QCGDX Quantified Common Ground Fund	18.04%	1.02%	9.87%	14.74%	-12.23%	32.19%	14.65%	0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between MVALX and QCGDX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019	0.75

The correlation between MVALX and QCGDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MVALX vs. QCGDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVALX

MVALX Risk / Return Rank: 55
MVALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
MVALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
MVALX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
MVALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
MVALX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

QCGDX

QCGDX Risk / Return Rank: 61
QCGDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
QCGDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
QCGDX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
QCGDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
QCGDX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVALX vs. QCGDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meridian Contrarian Fund (MVALX) and Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MVALX	QCGDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	1.97	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.88	2.91	-0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.37	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.44	4.17	-0.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.18	15.31	-3.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MVALX vs. QCGDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVALX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the QCGDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVALX and QCGDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MVALX	QCGDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.06	1.97	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	0.62	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.70	-0.09

Drawdowns

MVALX vs. QCGDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVALX drawdown since its inception was -50.65%, which is greater than QCGDX's maximum drawdown of -22.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVALX and QCGDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MVALX	QCGDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.65%	-22.37%	-28.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.53%	-5.55%	-5.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.80%	-16.10%	-8.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.80%	-20.18%	-4.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.39%	+0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.12%	-6.13%	-0.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.22%	1.52%	+1.70%

Volatility

MVALX vs. QCGDX - Volatility Comparison

Meridian Contrarian Fund (MVALX) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to Quantified Common Ground Fund (QCGDX) at 3.50%. This indicates that MVALX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCGDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MVALX	QCGDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.33%	3.50%	+2.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.51%	9.22%	+5.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.25%	11.73%	+7.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.74%	14.75%	+5.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.44%	16.46%	+4.98%

MVALX vs. QCGDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVALX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is lower than QCGDX's 1.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

MVALX vs. QCGDX - Dividend Comparison

MVALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.90%, more than QCGDX's 0.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MVALX Meridian Contrarian Fund	10.90%	12.81%	4.26%	5.45%	11.45%	14.16%	4.93%	7.94%	25.52%	10.53%	0.52%	16.76%
QCGDX Quantified Common Ground Fund	0.59%	0.69%	4.42%	0.22%	0.00%	5.44%	1.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MVALX and QCGDX in my portfolio?

MVALX and QCGDX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MVALX or QCGDX?

MVALX has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to QCGDX (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVALX dropped -50.65% vs QCGDX's -22.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MVALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.